midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
356 P.3d 195
Utah Ct. App.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • O.G. was born to Mother (Winsome Grant) in 2005; paternity was established in court naming Bo Driggs (Father), Tina Lindsay’s son.
  • Mother and her parents (Colin and June Grant) obstructed Father’s court-ordered visitation; Father last saw O.G. in mid-2007 and later died in 2008.
  • Mother’s sister and brother-in-law (Sacha and Brett Walker) adopted O.G.; after adoption the Walkers denied Lindsay any visitation or contact.
  • Lindsay sought statutory grandparent visitation and damages (including civil conspiracy) against Mother, the Grants, the Walkers, and attorney Wilkinson.
  • The district court dismissed the grandparent-visitation petition on standing grounds because adoption vested parental rights in the Walkers and terminated the natural parent’s rights; it later granted summary judgment on remaining claims, including civil conspiracy.
  • Lindsay’s Rule 60(b) motion to relieve the summary judgment (alleging counsel’s excusable neglect/medical impairment) was denied; she appealed both rulings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether O.G.’s adoption eliminated Lindsay’s statutory standing to seek grandparent visitation Lindsay: She remains a grandparent because Father’s parental rights were not terminated before he died and adopters were relatives Defendants: Adoption vested parental rights in adoptive parents and terminated natural-parent (and thus grandparent) rights under adoption statutes Court: Adoption extinguished Lindsay’s standing; statute permits post-adoption grandparent visitation only where stepparent adopts and prior court-ordered visitation exists
Whether the district court abused discretion in denying Rule 60(b) relief from summary judgment on civil conspiracy claim Lindsay: Counsel’s medical condition caused deficient opposition; supplemental filing showed excusable neglect warranting relief Defendants: No showing of excusable neglect; court observed attorney was capable and supplemental filing likely would not change result Court: Denial of Rule 60(b) relief affirmed; no abuse of discretion shown

Key Cases Cited

  • Kasper v. Nordfelt, 815 P.2d 747 (Utah Ct. App. 1991) (discusses effect of adoption on grandparent visitation availability)
  • Chesonis v. Brown, 153 P.3d 796 (Utah Ct. App. 2006) (adoption can remove statutory standing to seek visitation)
  • In re B.B.M., 514 N.W.2d 425 (Iowa 1994) (contrast treating nonrelative confidential adoptions as giving the child a fresh start)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Lindsay v. Walker
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Utah
Date Published: Jul 30, 2015
Citations: 356 P.3d 195; 792 Utah Adv. Rep. 62; 2015 Utah App. LEXIS 192; 2015 UT App 184; 2015 WL 4572976; 20140091-CA
Docket Number: 20140091-CA
Court Abbreviation: Utah Ct. App.
Log In