History
  • No items yet
midpage
956 N.E.2d 1247
Mass. App. Ct.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Lindor sued McDonald’s in Massachusetts Superior Court after a 2007 slip on an icy sidewalk near a McDonald’s restaurant.
  • McDonald’s moved for summary judgment contending that the ice was a natural accumulation and not actionable under Massachusetts law as applied at the time.
  • Lindor filed no opposition; the judge allowed the motion in a marginal notation dated July 22, 2010, with the judgment entered July 28, 2010.
  • Before or around that time, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued Papadopoulos v. Target Corp., which rejected a natural/unnatural distinction and adopted a reasonable-care standard for winter conditions.
  • The Papadopoulos decision announced retroactivity, and the court noted that the retroactivity did not revive actions concluded by judgment or settlement; Lindor’s action, however, had not yet entered a final judgment at the time Papadopoulos was decided.
  • The appellate court held that Papadopoulos applies to Lindor’s case as there is a genuine issue of material fact about McDonald’s knowledge and remediation efforts under the new standard and accordingly vacated the judgment and remanded for proceedings consistent with Papadopoulos.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Retroactivity of Papadopoulos to this case Lindor contends Papadopoulos applies to her case. McDonald’s argues the new rule does not apply to claims concluded by judgment. Papadopoulos applies retroactively.
Genuine issue of material fact under Papadopoulos standard There is evidence McDonald’s knew or should have known of dangerous ice and failed to take reasonable steps. The record does not clearly show knowledge or reasonable remediation. There is a genuine issue of material fact; judgment vacated and remanded.
Effect of marginal judgment entry on finality N/A N/A Not necessary to decide separately in view of retroactivity ruling and merits remand.

Key Cases Cited

  • Papadopoulos v. Target Corp., 457 Mass. 368 (Mass. 2010) (adopts reasonable-care standard for winter conditions; retroactivity discussed)
  • Barrasso v. Hillview W. Condominium Trust, 74 Mass. App. Ct. 135 (Mass. App. Ct. 2009) (recognizes traditional approach to ice-related liability)
  • Vassallo v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 428 Mass. 1 (Mass. 1998) (normal retroactivity framework for changes in law)
  • Galvin v. Welsh M.G. Co., 382 Mass. 340 (Mass. 1981) (retroactivity considerations for appellate developments)
  • Fleming v. Shaheen Bros., 71 Mass. App. Ct. 223 (Mass. App. Ct. 2008) (case discussing judgment entry timing)
  • Siebe, Inc. v. Louis M. Gerson Co., 74 Mass. App. Ct. 544 (Mass. App. Ct. 2009) (standard for reviewing summary judgment de novo)
  • Davidson Pipe Supply Co. v. Johnson, 14 Mass. App. Ct. 518 (Mass. App. Ct. 1982) (burden on moving party in summary judgment)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Lindor v. McDonald's Restaurants of Massachusetts, Inc.
Court Name: Massachusetts Appeals Court
Date Published: Nov 10, 2011
Citations: 956 N.E.2d 1247; 2011 Mass. App. LEXIS 1402; 80 Mass. App. Ct. 909; No. 10-P-1615
Docket Number: No. 10-P-1615
Court Abbreviation: Mass. App. Ct.
Log In