Lewis v. State
291 Ga. 273
| Ga. | 2012Background
- Lewis robbed multiple victims during a four‑day 2001 crime spree, beginning with a Jeep Cherokee theft in DeKalb County on October 5, with a chrome .357 revolver.
- On October 7, 2001, he accosted Reid and Dinkins, fired, and Dinkins was killed; a subsequent shooting at Webb’s scene followed.
- Police found Chandler’s Jeep Cherokee abandoned; Lewis’s fingerprints were inside, and a chrome .357 revolver and a .22 pistol were recovered at his home.
- Ballistics linked the .357 revolver to bullets recovered from Dinkins, Webb, and the Denson/Roman shooting scene.
- Over October 7–10, 2001, Lewis and an accomplice robbed and shot several victims, including Antwon and Herbert Cox; multiple firearm offenses were charged.
- Lewis was convicted on multiple counts and sentenced to two life terms plus additional prison terms; some counts merged or were vacated by law.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juror disqualification and waiver | Lewis contends juror was disqualified for cousin relationship. | State argues waiver since Lewis did not move to strike. | Waiver established; not grounds for new trial. |
| Admission of the .22 revolver evidence | The .22 pistol lacks relevance to the crimes; prejudicial. | The .22 pistol admissible as possible instrument of an accessory. | Admissible; relevant to accessory theory; no reversible error. |
| Hearsay and res gestae evidence | Phillips, Davis, and Heard statements were improperly admitted as hearsay. | Statements fit res gestae or conspiratorial context and were harmless in aggregate. | Harmless or properly admitted under res gestae/conspiracy doctrines; no reversal. |
| Eyewitness identification instruction | Trial should include hearsay-related identification instruction. | No error; adequate evidence and defense arguments supported verdicts. | Harmless error; Brodes guidance applied; no reversal. |
| Sentencing for firearm possession counts (Counts 16 and 23) | Consecutive sentencing structure improperly merged with underlying felonies. | Statutory scheme requires consecutive sentences to underlying felonies; lenity not applicable. | Count 23 sentence vacated and remanded for resentencing; proper application of Busch; other sentences unaffected. |
Key Cases Cited
- Williams v. State, 206 Ga. 107 (1949) (juror disqualification waiver when not timely challenged)
- Reid v. State, 204 Ga. App. 358 (1992) (waiver of juror disqualification effect)
- Henderson v. State, 272 Ga. 621 (2000) (firearm possession does not impute bad character)
- Tyler v. State, 251 Ga. 381 (1983) (relevance of accessory evidence)
- Inman v. State, 281 Ga. 67 (2006) (res gestae admissibility timing)
- Edmond v. State, 283 Ga. 507 (2008) (harmlessness where evidence is cumulative)
- Heard v. State, 287 Ga. 554 (2010) (co-conspirator statements admissible under conspiracy rules)
- Johnson v. State, 289 Ga. 22 (2011) (harmless error in identification testimony)
- McKenzie v. State, 284 Ga. 342 (2008) (Brodes identification warning application in pre-Brodes trials)
- Brodes v. State, 279 Ga. 435 (2005) (identification testimony error deemed harmless in many cases)
- Busch v. State, 271 Ga. 591 (1999) (sentencing consecutive to underlying felony)
- Wilson v. State, 286 Ga. 141 (2009) (ineffective appellate counsel framework)
- Rogers v. State, 290 Ga. 401 (2012) (procedural bar on ineffective assistance claims)
