History
  • No items yet
midpage
768 S.E.2d 730
W. Va.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Scotchel is a WV lawyer admitted 1984 practicing in Morgantown with no prior discipline.
  • HPS found he charged unreasonable fees and misappropriated Snow Sanitation sale proceeds.
  • He kept about $160,000 of $275,000 sale proceeds and failed to provide a full accounting.
  • Records and time entries were destroyed/lost; no complete itemized billing was produced.
  • The Board recommended annulment of Scotchel’s license and costs; reinstatement sanctions were premature.
  • Court concluded clear and convincing evidence supports misconduct and annulment, with reinstatement to be determined later.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Due process and signature issues in the ethics complaint Scotchel argues Snow/Deborah Robinson lacked proper signatory verification. ODC contends not violated; notary and witnesses support signing. No due process violation; signature issue resolved against Scotchel.
Whether HPS findings of Rule violations are supported Scotchel contends fees were reasonable and agreed; disputes credibility of documents. Snow/Robinson testimony, documents, and failure to recreate billing undermine defenses. Findings supported by clear and convincing evidence.
Appropriate sanction for misappropriation and misconduct ODC seeks annulment to protect public; substantial misconduct. Mitigating factors exist; less than annulment may be sufficient. Annulment appropriate; reinstatement premature.

Key Cases Cited

  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jordan, 204 W.Va. 495 (1998) (disbarment generally warranted for misappropriation; factors for sanctions)
  • Committee on Legal Ethics v. Walker, 178 W.Va. 150 (1987) (sanctions must deter and restore public confidence; discuss sanctions list)
  • Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Kupec, 202 W.Va. 556 (1998) (misappropriation; disbarment generally required absent extenuating circumstances)
  • McGraw, Syl. Pt. 1, 194 W.Va. 788 (1995) (Rule 3.7 standard of proof is clear and convincing)
  • Walker, Syl. Pt. 3, 178 W.Va. 150 (1987) (consider deterrence and public confidence in sanctions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. John C. Scotchel, Jr.
Court Name: West Virginia Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 25, 2014
Citations: 768 S.E.2d 730; 2014 W. Va. LEXIS 1260; 234 W. Va. 627; 11-0728
Docket Number: 11-0728
Court Abbreviation: W. Va.
Log In
    Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. John C. Scotchel, Jr., 768 S.E.2d 730