916 N.W.2d 351
Minn.2018Background
- Defendant Edward LaPenotiere was charged with second-degree sale of a controlled substance in a "school zone" after selling heroin and Vicodin from his home.
- Minnesota law defines "school zone" to include school property and "the area surrounding school property ... to a distance of 300 feet or one city block, whichever distance is greater."
- LaPenotiere's house sat on a city block kitty-corner (diagonal) to school property; the State introduced an aerial map and officer testimony placing the house on that block but offered no 300-foot measurement.
- LaPenotiere sought postconviction relief arguing the one-city-block rule applies only to blocks with a side facing the school (not kitty-corner blocks), so the State had to prove the 300-foot distance, which it did not do.
- The postconviction court and court of appeals affirmed; the Minnesota Supreme Court granted review and held that when land is organized in a city-block system, a "school zone" includes the entirety of first-ring blocks, including kitty-corner blocks.
- Applying that interpretation, the Court found the map and officer testimony sufficient to support the conviction.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether "one city block" in the school-zone statute includes the entire area of a kitty-corner block when surrounding land is a city-block system | LaPenotiere: "one city block" should be read as a distance for kitty-corner blocks, so the State must prove the 300-foot measure for such blocks | State: "one city block" is an area measurement creating a buffer that includes all first-ring blocks (including kitty-corner) | Held: "one city block" is ambiguous but, construing statute to effectuate legislative purpose, it means area — the school zone includes entire first-ring blocks, including kitty-corner blocks |
| Whether the evidence was sufficient to prove the school-zone element of the offense | LaPenotiere: Without proof of 300-foot distance, evidence was insufficient because his block is kitty-corner | State: Map and officer testimony locating the house on the first-ring kitty-corner block suffice | Held: Sufficient — aerial map and officer testimony allowed a jury to find the sale occurred within the school zone under the area-based one-block rule |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Carufel, 783 N.W.2d 539 (interpreting the park-zone provision and discussing "one city block" as both distance and area)
- State v. Benniefield, 678 N.W.2d 42 (describing legislative purpose of school/park zones to protect children from drug-related dangers)
- State v. Henderson, 907 N.W.2d 623 (statutory-interpretation standards and de novo review)
