History
  • No items yet
midpage
782 S.E.2d 613
Va. Ct. App.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Lamont Woods shot and killed Lamar Ward on April 28, 2012; Woods was tried by jury and convicted of second-degree murder (reduced from first-degree). Woods was also convicted of related offenses but only challenges the murder conviction on appeal.
  • Prior to the shooting, Woods and the victim had interactions and threats tied to Woods’s relationship with Takea Turner; the victim and others arrived at Woods’s trailer and an argument ensued.
  • Woods testified the victim flashed a gun, he feared for his life, pulled his own gun, and fired while running toward the woods; Woods claimed he was not aiming to kill but firing to escape.
  • Forensic evidence: ten cartridge cases from a single firearm; five bullets recovered from the victim; the victim sustained ten gunshot wounds (three fatal) including multiple shots to the back; all ten shots hit the victim and several were fired through the car’s rear windshield.
  • Trial court instructed the jury on first- and second-degree murder and self-defense, but denied Woods’s requested instruction on voluntary manslaughter (and involuntary manslaughter as to which he did not assign error).

Issues

Issue Woods’s Argument Commonwealth’s Argument Held
Whether the trial court erred by refusing a voluntary-manslaughter jury instruction Woods argued the evidence showed provocation/heat of passion (argument and threats) and more than a scintilla supported the instruction Commonwealth argued the physical evidence contradicted Woods’s heat-of-passion account and supported malice; alternative argument that jury’s guilty finding on malicious shooting rejected lack of malice Court held no error: Woods’s testimony was contradicted by uncontroverted physical evidence (ten hits, multiple shots to the back) and did not amount to more than a scintilla of evidence of heat of passion, so no voluntary manslaughter instruction was warranted

Key Cases Cited

  • Brandau v. Commonwealth, 16 Va. App. 408 (Va. Ct. App.) (evidence that pales to a scintilla when contradicted by undisputed physical facts does not require lesser-included instruction)
  • McClung v. Commonwealth, 215 Va. 654 (Va. 1975) (when credible evidence of provocation and heat of passion exists, instruction on voluntary manslaughter is required)
  • Turner v. Commonwealth, 23 Va. App. 270 (Va. Ct. App.) (distinguishable example where physical evidence did not contradict defendant’s heat-of-passion testimony)
  • Commonwealth v. Vaughn, 263 Va. 31 (Va. 2002) (trial court may deny lesser-included instruction when uncontroverted physical evidence is inconsistent with defendant’s lesser-intent theory)
  • Leal v. Commonwealth, 265 Va. 142 (Va. 2003) (undisputed evidence of massive injuries inconsistent with defendant’s lesser-intent account supports denying lesser-included instruction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Lamont Anthony Woods v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Virginia
Date Published: Mar 8, 2016
Citations: 782 S.E.2d 613; 2016 Va. App. LEXIS 70; 66 Va. App. 123; 0315153
Docket Number: 0315153
Court Abbreviation: Va. Ct. App.
Log In
    Lamont Anthony Woods v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 782 S.E.2d 613