Lacey v. State
288 Ga. 341
| Ga. | 2010Background
- Lacey was convicted after a jury trial of malice murder, two counts of felony murder, armed robbery, two counts of aggravated assault, and firearm possession during a crime connected to Cunningham's death and Mayhew's injury.
- Cunningham planned to sell marijuana; Mayhew and Freeman were present on the porch when Lacey arrived with Buskey and went inside to retrieve a scale.
- A struggle and gunfire occurred; Mayhew was shot while Cunningham later died from a gunshot wound to the abdomen.
- Buskey testified about Dyer’s plan to rob Cunningham; she drove Lacey to Cunningham’s home and described related statements by Dyer, Chapman, Torres, and Crossley.
- Dyer, Torres, Chapman, and Crossley provided testimony about Lacey’s version of events, including fights, a gun fall, and Lacey firing three times.
- The trial court denied new-trial relief; on appeal, Lacey challenged jury instructions, prosecutorial conduct, and ineffective assistance of counsel claims.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of the evidence | Lacey argues insufficient evidence to convict. | State asserts sufficient evidence supports guilt. | Evidence sufficient beyond reasonable doubt |
| Failure to give party to a crime/conspiracy charges | Requested charges necessary to address witness bias and biasing context. | Waived due to lack of timely specific objection; plain error absent. | Waiver without plain error; no reversible error |
| Prosecutorial comments on right to silence and victim impact | Prosecutor improperly commented on silence and used impermissible victim-impact argument. | Remarks were proper context and not aimed at denial of testimony. | Waived and not reversible error |
| Ineffective assistance of counsel | Counsel failed to object to improper prosecutorial conduct. | No deficient performance or prejudice shown; remarks not improper. | No ineffective assistance established |
| Specifics of trial objections/waiver | Trial objections preserved certain issues for appellate review. | Defaulted objections; plain error not shown. | Procedural waiver without plain error |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1980) (standard for reviewing sufficiency of evidence)
- Smith v. State, 279 Ga. 48 (2005) (prosecutor may not comment on failure to testify)
- Sampson v. State, 282 Ga. 82 (2007) (waiver of objections to prosecutorial conduct)
- Braithwaite v. State, 275 Ga. 884 (2002) (waiver of objections to prosecutorial conduct)
- Lampley v. State, 284 Ga. 37 (2008) (standard for ineffective assistance claims)
- Sermons v. State, 262 Ga. 286 (1992) (incidental victim-impact context in guilt phase)
- Thornton v. State, 264 Ga. 563 (1994) (legality of references to victim status in non-death context)
- Brown v. State, 258 Ga. App. 78 (2002) (admission of victim-related evidence for proper purpose)
