Kevin Realworldfare v. Tamara Lucile Wagner, 5:25-cv-01330

Plaintiffs Kevin Realworldfare and Corey Walker, proceeding pro se, sued Tamara Wagner (a state court commissioner), Kai Fan, and Does, stemming from an unlawful detainer (eviction) action in Riverside County Superior Court.
Plaintiffs sought immediate restoration of possession of property, injunctions against further state court action, and a stay of prior state court orders.
The Court previously denied Plaintiffs’ first request for emergency injunctive relief.
Plaintiffs then filed a second, nearly identical motion, now construed by the Court as a motion for reconsideration.
Plaintiffs submitted additional affidavits and documents, asserting new interpretations of jurisdiction and authority.
Defendants did not appear or file an opposition; the motion was decided on the papers.

Issue	Plaintiff's Argument	Defendant's Argument	Held
Injunctive relief against state court proceedings	Federal court has authority to enjoin state unlawful detainer actions	Not present	Court lacks authority to enjoin ongoing state detainer cases
Judicial immunity for state commissioner (Wagner)	Wagner exceeded jurisdiction, so no immunity	Not present	Wagner is immune for acts within her judicial capacity
Standard for reconsideration	New facts and interpretations justify revisiting denial of injunctive relief	Not present	No new facts or law; reconsideration denied
Federal jurisdiction over state court matters	Removal established exclusive federal jurisdiction; oversight required	Not present	Plaintiffs fundamentally misconstrue federal removal law

United States v. Smith, 389 F.3d 944 (9th Cir. 2004) (discusses when a district court may reconsider prior rulings while retaining jurisdiction)
City of Los Angeles v. Santa Monica Baykeeper, 254 F.3d 882 (9th Cir. 2001) (outlines a court’s inherent power to reconsider its interlocutory orders)