History
  • No items yet
midpage
Keith Ex Rel. Estate of Cook v. DeKalb County
749 F.3d 1034
11th Cir.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • On Jan. 7, 2009, pretrial detainee Godfrey Cook was murdered in DeKalb County Jail cell 613 by fellow detainee Saleevan Adan; plaintiff Nadine Keith sued as administrator of Cook’s estate under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Georgia wrongful-death and sheriff-liability statutes.
  • Cook and Adan were housed in 3SW pod 600, a mental-health housing pod where inmates assessed by contracted mental-health provider (MHM) as not dangerous could be placed in two-bed cells and moved among cells within the pod.
  • Adan had an extensive mental-health history, had been moved repeatedly among 3A, 3SW, and 7NE, and a Dec. 12, 2008 state court order finding him incompetent and dangerous was not relayed to the Sheriff or MHM before the killing.
  • Jail staff moved Adan into cell 613 (occupied by Cook) after Adan refused his assigned cell; detention officers did not notify classification or MHM of the cell change; an in-cell call apparently went unanswered and an officer was using a personal cell phone.
  • The Sheriff’s Office investigated and disciplined officers for policy violations, but Keith alleged the Sheriff (Brown) was individually liable for (1) failing to supervise/segregate inmates and (2) failing to train officers, asserting deliberate indifference in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • The district court denied Sheriff Brown qualified-immunity summary judgment on the § 1983 claim; the Eleventh Circuit reversed, holding Brown entitled to summary judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Supervisor liability for deliberate indifference based on housing/movement policies Brown knew or was on notice of widespread dangerous practices (cell relocations, policy noncompliance) creating substantial risk to detainees like Cook No evidence Brown had subjective knowledge of a widespread, obvious pattern; many failures were isolated or attributable to subordinates; policies existed but were not uniformly followed Reversed: plaintiff failed to show Brown had subjective knowledge of widespread abuse or causal connection required for supervisor § 1983 liability
Failure to segregate mental-health inmates or override MHM placement decisions Brown should have segregated violent mental-health detainees and disregarded MHM placements that put inmates together Sheriff reasonably relied on contracted mental-health professionals; law does not require sheriff to second-guess or override medical judgments absent evidence of reckless incompetence Held for Brown: no clearly established duty to ignore medical contractor’s assessments; no evidence MHM was recklessly incompetent
Failure-to-train liability Training was constitutionally deficient, permitting cell-moves and other practices that led to Cook’s death No pattern of similar constitutional violations to put Brown on notice; a single prior incident (Jenkins) was insufficient; plaintiff didn’t show how additional training would have prevented this Held for Brown: plaintiff failed to show deliberate indifference in training or that the law was clearly established
Qualified immunity (clearly established law) Reasonable official would know moving known-risk inmates or permitting unchecked cell changes violated detainees’ rights No controlling precedent made it obvious sheriff had an affirmative constitutional duty to override medical placements or to govern the specific cell-assignment practice Held for Brown: even if a constitutional violation were arguable, it was not clearly established; Brown entitled to qualified immunity

Key Cases Cited

  • Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511 (qualified immunity interlocutory appeal rule)
  • Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (qualified immunity two-step inquiry; flexibility to address either prong first)
  • Marsh v. Butler Cnty., Ala., 268 F.3d 1014 (11th Cir. en banc) (deliberate indifference standard in prison/detainee context)
  • Cottone v. Jenne, 326 F.3d 1352 (11th Cir. 2003) (requirements for supervisor liability under § 1983)
  • City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378 (failure-to-train liability standard)
  • Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51 (actual/constructive notice; pattern ordinarily necessary for failure-to-train)
  • Hope v. Pelzer, 536 U.S. 730 (clarifying when rights are clearly established)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Keith Ex Rel. Estate of Cook v. DeKalb County
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: Apr 23, 2014
Citation: 749 F.3d 1034
Docket Number: 13-11250
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.