History
  • No items yet
midpage
Karen Stavins Enterprises, Inc. v. Community College District No. 508
36 N.E.3d 1015
Ill. App. Ct.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Karen Stavins Enterprises, Inc. (talent agent) sues City Colleges for the value of nine actors’ services in a commercial.
  • City Colleges allegedly hired actors through plaintiff for a TV and online production extolling City Colleges’ education.
  • Plaintiff asserts City Colleges did not have an express contract but accepted the services and benefited from them.
  • City Colleges moved to dismiss under 735 ILCS 5/2-615, arguing lack of compliance with its contract procedures.
  • Complaint seeks $13,909.37 plus interest and costs; actors were paid nothing.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the complaint states a claim for a contract implied in law Stavins argues quasi-contract recovery exists City Colleges contends no implied contract without compliance with procedures Yes, stated a claim for contract implied in law

Key Cases Cited

  • Urbaitis v. Commonwealth Edison, 143 Ill. 2d 458 (1991) (test for de novo review on 2-615 dismissal; take allegations as true)
  • Illinois Graphics Co. v. Nickum, 159 Ill. 2d 469 (1994) (limits outside evidence in 2-615 ruling to pleadings)
  • Hayes Mechanical, Inc. v. First Industrial, L.P., 351 Ill. App. 3d 1 (2004) (elements of contract implied in law; unjust enrichment)
  • Cannella v. Village of Bridgeview, 284 Ill. App. 3d 1065 (1996) (recovery requires unjust retention of benefits; no explicit contract needed)
  • Zadrozny v. City Colleges of Chicago, 220 Ill. App. 3d 290 (1991) (no contract implied in law if express/implicit contract exists on same subject)
  • Woodfield Lanes, Inc. v. Village of Schaumburg, 168 Ill. App. 3d 763 (1988) (implied-in-law contract may arise despite failure to follow procurement procedures)
  • Wacker-Wabash Corp. v. City of Chicago, 350 Ill. App. 3d 343 (1953) (recognizes contract implied in law against governmental entities)
  • Century 21 Castles by King, Ltd. v. First National Bank of Western Springs, 170 Ill. App. 3d 544 (1988) (elements of unjust enrichment and implied contract)
  • HPI Health Care Services, Inc. v. Mt. Vernon Hospital, Inc., 131 Ill. 2d 145 (1989) (principles for recovery under contract implied in law)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Karen Stavins Enterprises, Inc. v. Community College District No. 508
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Aug 25, 2015
Citation: 36 N.E.3d 1015
Docket Number: 1-15-0356
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.