History
  • No items yet
midpage
539 F. App'x 215
4th Cir.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Kuhn sought living miner benefits under the Black Lung Benefits Act as amended by PPACA § 1556.
  • The fifteen-year presumption requires underground coal mine employment for 15+ years and a totally disabling impairment.
  • Kuhn’s above-ground work with Kanawha Coal occurred at an underground mine site.
  • All x-ray evidence showed no complicated pneumoconiosis; Kuhn had a totally disabling pulmonary impairment.
  • The ALJ found the fifteen-year presumption satisfied and the Employer failed to rebut it with credible evidence.
  • The BRB affirmed; the Employer petition for review was denied.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Kuhn meets the fifteen-year presumption Kuhn’s above-ground duties at an underground site qualify. Kuhn must prove underground-like work conditions. Yes; presumption applies.
Whether the DOL interpretation of 'underground coal mine' is valid DOL interpretation includes Kuhn’s above-ground work at an underground site. Interpretation may be inconsistent with the statute. Not arbitrary or contrary; controlling.
Whether Employer rebutted the fifteen-year presumption Employer failed to show no pneumoconiosis or lack of causation. Employer’s experts rebut the presumption. Employer failed to rebut; presumption stands.

Key Cases Cited

  • Island Creek Coal Co. v. Compton, 211 F.3d 203 (4th Cir. 2000) (limits de novo review and substantial evidence standard for prior findings)
  • Harman Mining Co. v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs, 678 F.3d 305 (4th Cir. 2012) (credibility and weight given to conflicting medical opinions)
  • Underwood v. Elkay Mining, Inc., 105 F.3d 946 (4th Cir. 1997) (judge’s duty to evaluate evidence and form independent conclusions)
  • Morrison v. Tenn. Consol. Coal Co., 644 F.3d 473 (6th Cir. 2011) (limitations on rebutting the presumption; causation standards)
  • Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc., 501 U.S. 680 (Supreme Court 1991) (deference to agency interpretations of statutes)
  • Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (Supreme Court 1984) (agency deference for ambiguous statutory provisions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kanawha Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 11, 2013
Citations: 539 F. App'x 215; 12-2566
Docket Number: 12-2566
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
Log In