History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jones v. State
325 Ga. App. 845
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Jones pled guilty to one count of theft by deception under OCGA § 16-8-3 after indictment in 2011 for taking $2,611.29 from an elderly victim in a roofing scheme.
  • He was sentenced to ten years with five years to be served in custody; he appeals denial of his motion to withdraw the guilty plea.
  • He argues the five-year portion is grossly disproportionate to the crime and that the plea was not knowingry entered.
  • The court reviews for gross disproportionality by comparing offense gravity to sentence; if within statutory range, no disproportionality absent shock to conscience.
  • Jones’ sentence falls within the statutory range under OCGA § 16-8-12, so not shocking to conscience.
  • The record shows Jones entered a voluntary guilty plea, despite arguments about an Alford plea; the court found no manifest injustice in the plea.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the sentence is grossly disproportionate. Jones asserts disproportionate punishment. State contends within statutory range so not disproportionate. No gross disproportionality; within statutory limits.
Whether the guilty plea was knowingly entered (Alford issue). Jones claims plea resembled Alford and required specific questions. State contends plea was knowingly entered; transcript shows conscientious waiver of rights. No manifest injustice; plea knowingly entered.

Key Cases Cited

  • Adams v. State, 288 Ga. 695 (Ga. 2011) (threshold Eighth Amendment disproportionality inquiry)
  • Bragg v. State, 296 Ga. App. 422 (Ga. App. 2009) (rare threshold disproportionality cases)
  • Cuvas v. State, 306 Ga. App. 679 (Ga. App. 2010) (presumption of proportionality within statutory range)
  • McLeod v. State, 251 Ga. App. 371 (Ga. App. 2001) (within statutory range negates disproportionate sentence)
  • Williams v. State, 318 Ga. App. 744 (Ga. App. 2012) (plea withdrawal standards and manifest injustice framework)
  • Bell v. State, 294 Ga. 5 (Ga. 2013) (Alford-like pleas evaluated for knowingness of consent)
  • McKiernan v. State, 288 Ga. 140 (Ga. 2010) (Alford considerations do not add extra requirements for advisement)
  • Fleming v. State, 271 Ga. 587 (Ga. 1999) (general rule to apply current law at time of offense)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Jones v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 27, 2014
Citation: 325 Ga. App. 845
Docket Number: A13A1896
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.