History
  • No items yet
midpage
942 F. Supp. 2d 396
S.D.N.Y.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Johnson, a Jamaican citizen, entered U.S. on a visitor visa in 2001 and later stayed unlawfully after visa expiry.
  • Johnson pleaded guilty to Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in 2007 in NY; completed treatment in 2008.
  • ICE detained Johnson starting January 18, 2012, initiating removal proceedings; he was charged as removable for the 2007 conviction and unlawful presence.
  • An IJ ordered removal to Jamaica on December 17, 2012; Johnson appealed to the BIA, triggering automatic stay.
  • Petition for writ of habeas corpus was filed September 12, 2012; counsel was appointed in March 2013; argument centers on detention under §1226(c).
  • Court to hold a hearing on July 2, 2013 to re-evaluate the claim and potential bond-related relief if warranted.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether §1226(c) authorizes Johnson’s detention given delayed custody. Johnson argues delay beyond release undermines §1226(c). Detention authorized under §1226(c) despite delay. §1226(c) ambiguous; BIA interpretation permissible; detention authorized.
Whether prolonged detention without an individualized bond hearing violates due process. Due process requires bond consideration to avoid unjust detention. Detention can be justified pending removal; no automatic bond right. Detention not currently unconstitutional; potential need for bond hearing if circumstances change.
Whether the petition should name the warden as proper respondent and which respondents are proper. Johnson argues for appropriate respondent clarification. Immediate custodian should be respondent; others retained for caution. Warden likely proper respondent; other respondents not dismissed pending July 2, 2013 hearing.
Whether Johnson’s detention remains reasonable given flight-risk and public-safety concerns. Long detention undermines flight risk justification. Detention serves purposes of ensuring appearance and public safety. Detention not unreasonable or unjustified under the total circumstances.

Key Cases Cited

  • Demore v. Kim, 538 U.S. 510 (U.S. 2003) (upheld constitutionality of §1226(c) detention in removal proceedings but with limits; notes potential due-process constraints)
  • Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. N. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (U.S. 1984) (establishes deference to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes)
  • Diop v. ICE/Homeland Sec., 656 F.3d 221 (3d Cir. 2011) (supports implicit time limitation under §1226(c) and need for individualized inquiry if detention is prolonged)
  • Ly v. Hansen, 351 F.3d 263 (6th Cir. 2003) (detention for reasonable time to complete removal proceedings; duration may be reviewed for reasonableness)
  • Hosh v. Lucero, 680 F.3d 375 (4th Cir. 2012) (affirms BIA deference and Chevron analysis for §1226(c) interpretations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Johnson v. Orsino
Court Name: District Court, S.D. New York
Date Published: Apr 24, 2013
Citations: 942 F. Supp. 2d 396; 2013 WL 1767740; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59073; No. 12 Civ. 6913 (PKC)
Docket Number: No. 12 Civ. 6913 (PKC)
Court Abbreviation: S.D.N.Y.
Log In
    Johnson v. Orsino, 942 F. Supp. 2d 396