Johnnie Lee Thompson v. State
10-16-00238-CR
| Tex. App. | Jul 26, 2017Background
- Johnnie Lee Thompson was convicted by a jury of assault-family violence; trial court found an enhancement true and sentenced him to 13 years imprisonment.
- The complaining witness, Sol-Lisha Henderson, repeatedly said she would not appear; she failed to appear at trial and a writ of attachment was issued.
- The State moved for forfeiture by wrongdoing under Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 38.49, and the court held an out-of-jury hearing on admissibility.
- Evidence at the forfeiture hearing: prior domestic incidents, Henderson’s 9-1-1 report and later non-prosecution affidavit, threats by Thompson (including “you’re going to die”), and multiple jail calls from Thompson to Henderson immediately before trial.
- Recorded jail call showed Thompson warning Henderson to leave town, telling her the DA wanted her, and otherwise attempting to discourage her testimony; investigator also testified Thompson used another inmate’s ID to place calls.
- Trial court found by a preponderance that Thompson wrongfully procured Henderson’s unavailability; court admitted related statements and later sentenced Thompson to 13 years (stated as 8 + 5 for truthfulness), which the appellate court affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | State's Argument | Thompson's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the trial court abused discretion by granting forfeiture by wrongdoing under Art. 38.49 | Conduct and statements (threats, repeated calls, jail call advising Henderson not to appear) show Thompson intended to and did procure Henderson’s unavailability | Article 38.49 requires proof that appellant’s actions caused Henderson’s absence; record insufficient to show causation | No abuse of discretion; court found by preponderance Thompson procured unavailability and intended to prevent testimony |
| Whether the judgment should be reformed to an 8-year sentence instead of 13 years | Court plainly pronounced a total sentence of 13 years and considered extraneous-offense evidence and credibility in punishment | Pronouncement of "eight years for the crime" means judgment should reflect 8 years | Affirmed: judgment of 13 years stands; trial court authorized to consider character/extraneous offenses in punishment |
Key Cases Cited
- Giles v. California, 554 U.S. 353 (2008) (forfeiture-by-wrongdoing requires defendant engaged in conduct intended to prevent witness testimony)
- Gonzalez v. State, 195 S.W.3d 114 (Tex. Crim. App.) (Confrontation Clause and forfeiture-by-wrongdoing principles)
- Shepherd v. State, 489 S.W.3d 559 (Tex. App. — Texarkana) (review of trial court's forfeiture determination for abuse of discretion and application of Art. 38.49)
