History
  • No items yet
midpage
245 P.3d 685
Or. Ct. App.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • 1920 stipulation between predecessors of Jeld-Wen and PacifiCorp included an arbitration clause requiring arbitration for damages and related claims.
  • 1920 stipulation obligated PacifiCorp's predecessor to hold landowners harmless from dikes/levees damage.
  • 2006 Geary Dike flood caused damages to land now owned by Jeld-Wen; Jeld-Wen sued PacifiCorp and others.
  • PacifiCorp moved to compel arbitration based on the 1920 stipulation; trial court granted then denied on reconsideration.
  • Oregon Act (2003) §3(3) argues arbitration agreements govern “whenever made”; issue whether it applies to the 1920 stipulation.
  • Court held the Oregon Act governs all arbitration agreements regardless of when made, including the 1920 stipulation; reverse and remand for arbitration to be compelled.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Oregon Act governs arbitration “whenever made.” Jeld-Wen argues the Revised Act creates latent ambiguity; it does not apply to pre-1925 agreements. PacifiCorp argues the Oregon Act unambiguously governs all arbitration agreements made anytime. Oregon Act governs all, including the 1920 stipulation.

Key Cases Cited

  • Snider v. Production Chemical Manufacturing, Inc., 348 Or. 257 (2010) (governs arbitration Act applies to all agreements made)
  • Martin v. Comcast of California, 209 Or.App. 82 (2006) (Act applies to all arbitration agreements beginning Sept. 1, 2004)
  • State v. Gaines, 346 Or. 160 (2009) (legislative history may confirm plain meaning of statute)
  • Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. Hawkins, 155 Or. App. 554 (1998) (standard of reviewing motion to compel arbitration)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: JELD-WEN, INC. v. PacifiCORP
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Dec 29, 2010
Citations: 245 P.3d 685; 240 Or. App. 124; 0705144CV A139947
Docket Number: 0705144CV A139947
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
Log In
    JELD-WEN, INC. v. PacifiCORP, 245 P.3d 685