Jackson v. State
301 Ga. 878
Ga.2017Background
- Willie Jackson lived with sister Willie Mae; on May 3–4, 2006 he became convinced she had taken his Social Security check.
- On the evening of May 4, Jackson threatened his sister, created a disturbance to lure her out, retrieved a knife, and entered her bedroom.
- Jackson stabbed Willie Mae repeatedly; the blade broke in her body; he then used a machete. She died from 31 stab wounds.
- After a 911 call, police and S.W.A.T. found Jackson at the scene (with duct tape on his head and the apartment barricaded); he was arrested.
- Jackson was convicted by a jury of malice murder and possession of a knife during a felony; he was sentenced to life plus probation. He appealed arguing the trial court should have instructed the jury on voluntary manslaughter and on insanity.
Issues
| Issue | Jackson's Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the trial court erred by refusing a voluntary-manslaughter instruction as a lesser included offense | Jackson argued the evidence supported passion or provocation sufficient for voluntary manslaughter | The State argued the provocation was insufficient: the belief about the missing check developed over time, threats were made an hour earlier, and actions were deliberate | Court: No error — evidence did not show sudden, irresistible passion; voluntary manslaughter instruction not warranted |
| Whether the trial court erred by refusing an insanity instruction | Jackson asserted he suffered from schizophrenia/mania and acted strangely, supporting an insanity defense | The State argued Jackson presented no evidence he lacked capacity to distinguish right from wrong or acted under delusional compulsion | Court: No error — Jackson failed to meet burden to prove legal insanity; no evidence he could not distinguish right and wrong |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (standard for sufficiency of evidence)
- Dugger v. State, 297 Ga. 120 (distinguishing provocation for manslaughter from self-defense)
- Gresham v. State, 289 Ga. 103 (argument over money not serious provocation)
- Merritt v. State, 292 Ga. 327 (words alone ordinarily not serious provocation)
- Alvelo v. State, 290 Ga. 609 (defendant bears burden to prove insanity by preponderance)
- Phillips v. State, 255 Ga. 539 (medical descriptors of odd behavior insufficient for legal insanity)
- Lawrence v. State, 265 Ga. 310 (medical diagnosis of mental illness alone does not establish legal insanity)
