midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
463 B.R. 775
Bankr. M.D.N.C.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtor Whitley operated a purported factoring business; substantial investor transfers were alleged from Debtor to Defendant.
  • Trustee Ivy seeks avoidance/recovery of transfers under 11 U.S.C. §548 and NC UFTA §39-23.4(a)(1).
  • Transfers occurred within two years of petition or within four years under NC law; Plaintiff also seeks to disallow or reduce Defendant's Proof of Claim.
  • Complaint contends Debtor operated a Ponzi scheme; transfers were made with actual intent to defraud creditors.
  • Defendant moved to dismiss under FRBP 7012, FRCP 12(b)(6), and FRBP 7008/FRCP 8; Plaintiff opposed.
  • Court denies Defendant’s motion and allows Counts I–II and the Objection to proceed to trial.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Count I states an actual fraudulent transfer claim Transfers were funds of a Ponzi operator; presumption of actual fraud applies Argues lack of debtor's interest and insufficient pleading Count I survives; pleadings show transfers of debtor's interest and Ponzi presumption applies.
Whether Rule 9(b) particularity is satisfied for actual fraud Complaint provides transfer details and Ponzi scheme allegations Insufficient specificity for fraud Rule 9(b) satisfied; adequate factual basis for fraud pleading.
Whether Count II states a constructive fraudulent transfer claim Transfers within look-back period; debtor insolvent; transfers lacked value Value issue depends on consideration; some transfers may be value Count II survives; some transfers may lack value and be recoverable.
Whether the Objection to Proof of Claim is properly pleaded Facts plausibly show disallowance/reduction under fraud theories Objection lacks facts Objection denied; sufficient facts to proceed.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Hedged-Investments Assocs., Inc., 163 B.R. 841 (Bankr.D.Co­l. 1994) (Ponzi-scheme presumption supports actual fraud findings)
  • In re Ogden (Bailey v. Big Sky Motors, Ltd.), 314 F.3d 1190 (10th Cir. 2002) (Ponzi-scheme transfers may be treated as transfers of debtor's interest)
  • In re James River Coal Co., 360 B.R. 139 (Bankr.E.D.Va. 2007) (Rule 9(b) pleading leniency in fraudulent-transfer actions; no strict specificity required)
  • AFI Holding v. Accredon (In re AFI Holding), 525 F.3d 700 (9th Cir. 2008) (Ponzi findings support actual-fraud presumptions across statutes)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Ivey v. Swofford (In Re Whitley)
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina
Date Published: Jan 19, 2012
Citations: 463 B.R. 775; 2012 WL 170137; 16-50629
Docket Number: 16-50629
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. M.D.N.C.
Log In
    Ivey v. Swofford (In Re Whitley), 463 B.R. 775