History
  • No items yet
midpage
840 N.W.2d 641
N.D.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Burglaries in Bismarck totaling over $65,000 in losses and damage over several months.
  • Detective Fullerton conducted a probation search, gathered tip information, reviewed Facebook data, and performed a cell tower dump tying D.O. to the area and times of crimes.
  • Two search warrant affidavits were filed on January 16, 2013: one for Facebook activity and one for text messages.
  • Facebook affidavit linked location data and public posts suggesting burglary involvement; items from probation search linked to burglary methods.
  • State petitioned for delinquency acts and moved to transfer to district court; D.O. moved to suppress evidence and oppose transfer.
  • Juvenile court denied suppression and ordered transfer; State’s motion to transfer to district court affirmed on appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Franks hearing viability and false statements D.O. claims false statements in affidavit; Franks remedy should be applied. State contends no false statements; any omissions do not invalidate probable cause. No Franks error; no false/misleading information proven.
Probable cause to issue the Facebook search warrant D.O. argues insufficient probable cause from Facebook data alone. State contends totality of circumstances supports probable cause. Probable cause existed; totality supported issuance.
Admissibility of hearsay at transfer hearing and notice of witnesses D.O. asserts confrontation rights and notice violation at transfer. State argues relaxed evidentiary standards and proper cross-examination availability. No confrontation violation; hearsay admissible at transfer; notice adequate.
Transfer to district court proper D.O. challenges transfer on grounds of amenability to treatment and relevant factors. State shows reasonable grounds under NDCC 27-20-34(1)(c)(4) for transfer. Transfer to district court affirmed; reasonable grounds shown.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Dodson, 2003 ND 187 (ND) (probable cause standard to issue a search warrant; totality-of-the-circumstances)
  • Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (U.S. Supreme Court) ( Franks hearing when challenging false statements in affidavits)
  • Donovan, 2004 ND 201 (ND) (Franks standards and omission of information in affidavits)
  • State v. Poitra, 2010 ND 137 (ND) (omitted information must affect probable cause)
  • Interest of R.A., 2011 ND 119 (ND) (confrontation rights at transfer hearings are limited; evidence admissibility relaxed)
  • Interest of C.R.M., 552 N.W.2d 324 (ND) (hearsay admissible at transfer hearings; cross-examination available)
  • State v. Proell, 2007 ND 17 (ND) (totality-of-the-circumstances and multiple affidavits in search warrants)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Interest of D.O.
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 19, 2013
Citations: 840 N.W.2d 641; 2013 ND 247; 2013 WL 6698454; 2013 N.D. LEXIS 246; 20130174
Docket Number: 20130174
Court Abbreviation: N.D.
Log In