History
  • No items yet
midpage
In the Matter of the Estate of Joseph C. Gantner III, Rachel Gantner
2017 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 40
| Iowa | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Decedent Joseph Gantner died leaving a will and three retirement accounts (two IRAs and one SEP IRA) naming his two daughters as co‑beneficiaries; estate executor filed inventory valuing the IRAs at ~$214,100.
  • Surviving spouse Rachel sought a twelve‑month spousal support allowance under Iowa Code §633.374; the estate lacked sufficient probate assets absent the retirement accounts.
  • Rachel argued the IRAs should be reachable under Iowa Code §633D.8 as “transfers at death of a security registered in beneficiary form” (TOD/POD securities).
  • Daughters (beneficiaries) contended IRAs are nonprobate custodial retirement accounts governed by Iowa Code §633.357 and are not “securities” under chapter 633D.
  • Probate court denied Rachel’s allowance, finding the IRAs were nonprobate assets passing outside the estate; Rachel appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether IRAs that designate nonspouse beneficiaries are "securities registered in beneficiary form" under Iowa Code ch. 633D such that §633D.8 allows reaching them for spousal allowance Gantner (Rachel) argued the IRAs contain securities (mutual/index funds) and thus qualify as TOD securities under §633D.8, permitting the spousal allowance to attach Daughters argued IRAs are custodial independent retirement accounts governed by §633.357, pass outside probate, and do not fit chapter 633D’s definition of a security or security account The court held IRAs with nonspouse beneficiaries do not qualify as TOD securities under chapter 633D; §633.357 controls and IRAs are not available to satisfy the statutory spousal allowance

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Estate of Myers, 825 N.W.2d 1 (Iowa 2012) (POD/TOD assets excluded from elective share unless statute includes them)
  • In re Estate of Tollefsrud, 275 N.W.2d 412 (Iowa 1979) (surviving spouse’s statutory allowance is a near‑absolute right)
  • Veeder v. Veeder, 192 N.W. 409 (Iowa 1923) (historic recognition of spousal allowance rights)
  • Clark v. Rameker, 134 S. Ct. 2242 (2014) (inherited IRAs must be maintained as inherited accounts; nonspouse cannot treat as own)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In the Matter of the Estate of Joseph C. Gantner III, Rachel Gantner
Court Name: Supreme Court of Iowa
Date Published: Apr 21, 2017
Citation: 2017 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 40
Docket Number: 16–1028
Court Abbreviation: Iowa