History
  • No items yet
midpage
in the Matter of D.L.G.
14-16-00721-CV
| Tex. App. | Oct 25, 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant was a juvenile when he committed an offense; juvenile court waived jurisdiction and certified him for adult prosecution by order dated July 15, 1994.
  • Appellant was later convicted of murder in adult court; this court affirmed the conviction on direct appeal in 1997 and appellant did not challenge the juvenile waiver then.
  • On September 12, 2016—more than 22 years after the waiver order—appellant filed a notice of appeal attempting to challenge the juvenile court’s waiver and certification under Tex. Fam. Code § 54.02.
  • The rules required a notice of appeal within 30 days of the order (with a 15-day grace for an extension); the last day to file or seek extension was August 29, 1994.
  • The court notified the parties of its intent to dismiss for want of jurisdiction; appellant argued Moon v. State should control because of the specificity required in waiver orders, but his notice was untimely.
  • The court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and noted habeas corpus to the Court of Criminal Appeals as a possible remedy.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Timeliness / Jurisdiction to review 1994 juvenile waiver order Appellant: Moon requires reviewing the juvenile waiver for specificity; he seeks late review of the 1994 waiver State: The appeal is untimely; appellate jurisdiction is lost because notice and extension period expired in 1994 Dismissed for want of jurisdiction—the appeal was filed well after the deadline and the extension period had passed
Applicability of Moon v. State to pre-1996 transfer orders Appellant: Moon’s standards for required written findings apply to his 1994 waiver State: Even if Moon applies, appellant failed to file timely appeal so court cannot reach merits Court declined to reach merits; jurisdictional defect barred review

Key Cases Cited

  • Moon v. State, 451 S.W.3d 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (sets specificity and review standards for juvenile waiver orders under Tex. Fam. Code § 54.02)
  • Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615 (Tex. 1997) (once Rule 26.3 extension period expires, appellate jurisdiction cannot be invoked)
  • Ex parte Rodriguez, 466 S.W.3d 846 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015) (habeas relief discussed as an alternative remedy for long‑elapsed juvenile transfer defects)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: in the Matter of D.L.G.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Oct 25, 2016
Docket Number: 14-16-00721-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.