History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Thiem
443 B.R. 832
| Bankr. D. Ariz. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtors filed Chapter 7 petition; Mrs. Thiem is employed and Mr. Thiem receives disability Social Security.
  • Mrs. Thiem inherited her mother's traditional IRA; $10,032.57 remained in the inherited IRA at petition date.
  • Debtors claimed exemption in the inherited IRA under ARS § 33-1126(B) and 11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(3).
  • Trustee objected, arguing inherited IRAs are not exempt under state or federal law; argument included a possible $5,361.62 exemption limit.
  • Debtors amended Schedule C to include § 522(b)(3) and, alternatively, ARS § 33-1126(A)(1); court evaluated both bases.
  • Court found the inherited IRA remains exempt under § 33-1126(B) and § 522(b)(3)(C), with alternative exemption under § 33-1126(A)(1).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the inherited IRA is exempt under ARS § 33-1126(B) or § 522(b)(3)(C). Thiem; inherited IRA qualifies as retirement funds under exempt category. Thiem; inherited IRA not exempt, as not a traditional retirement plan or properly exempted funds. Yes; inherited IRA exempt under both ARS § 33-1126(B) and § 522(b)(3)(C).
Whether the inherited IRA qualifies under ARS § 33-1126(A)(1) as money payable upon the life of a deceased parent. Thiem; provision covers death benefits to survivors, including death of parent. Trustee; phrase limited to life-insurance concepts; not applicable here. Yes; alternative exemption under ARS § 33-1126(A)(1) recognized.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Nessa, 426 B.R. 312 (8th Cir. BAP 2010) (supports exemption of retirement funds under § 522(b)(3)(C) and § 522(d)(12))
  • Tabor, 433 B.R. 469 (Bankr. M.D. Pa. 2010) (inherited IRAs may be exempt as retirement funds under IRC; expansion under BAPCPA)
  • Kuchta, 434 B.R. 837 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2010) (opt-out state; inherited IRA exempt under § 522(b)(3)(C) and IRC § 408)
  • Jarboe, 365 B.R. 717 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2007) (inherited IRA exemption analyzed under § 522(b)(3)(C))
  • In re Palidora, 310 B.R. 164 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 2004) (Arizona interpretation of state exemption and how it applies to retirement funds)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Thiem
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona
Date Published: Jan 19, 2011
Citation: 443 B.R. 832
Docket Number: 4:10-bk-19279-JMM
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. D. Ariz.