Doeling v. Nessa (In Re Nessa)Doeling v. Nessa (In Re Nessa)
SCHERMER, Bankruptcy Judge.
Gеne W. Doeling, Chapter 7 trustee (the “Trustee”) for the bankruptcy estate of Nancy A. Nessa (the “Debtor”) appeals from an Order Overruling Objection to Exemption. The bankruptcy court
1
overruled the Trustee’s objection to the Debt- or’s claim of an exemption of her inherited IRA account under section 522(d)(12) of the Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). We have jurisdiction over this appeal from the final order of the bankruptcy court.
See
ISSUE
The issue on appeal is whether the Debtor’s inherited IRA qualifies as exempt pursuant to section 522(d)(12) of the Bankruptcy Code. We conclude that it does.
BACKGROUND
The Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code in January 2009. Prior to that filing, the Debtor’s father, Robert Borrett, had established an individual retirement account (“IRA”) pursuant to Section 408 of Title 26 of the United States Code (the “Internal Revenue Code”). The Debtor was named the beneficiary of thаt IRA. After her father died in August 2008, and before filing her bankruptcy petition, the Debtor made a trustee-to-trustee transfer of the IRA to her own aсcount at Wells Fargo; she did not “roll over” the account to her own IRA nor did she take any distributions from her father’s IRA. 2 The Debtor has not contributed any of her own funds to the inherited account, and any withdrawals will be taxable to her.
The Debtor claimed the inherited account as exempt in her Schedule E, pursuant to section 522(d)(12) of the Bankruptcy
The bankruptcy court overruled the Trustee’s objection to the Debtor’s claimed еxemption. It explained that the transfer of the contents of the Debtor’s father’s account to the inherited account was a trustee-to-trustee transfer as described in the Internal Revenue Service’s Publication 590. Individual Retirement Arrangements, (IRAs), Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Publication 590, at 20. The bankruptcy court then concluded that the transfer from the Debtor’s father’s account retained their character as retirement funds. Accordingly, it concluded that the funds in the account qualified for an exemption under Bankruptcy Code section 522(d)(12).
STANDARD OF REVIEW
We review the bankruptcy court’s conclusions of law
de novo. Alexander v. Jensen-Carter (In re Alexander),
DISCUSSION
A debtor’s bankruptcy estate is defined broadly to include all legal and equitable interests of the debtor in propеrty, as well as other specific interests of the debtor.
[rjetirement funds to the extent those funds are in a fund or account that is exempt from taxation under sectiоn 401, 403, 408, 408A, 414, 457, or 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
The Debtor’s father’s account was an “individual retirеment account”, as that term is defined under section 408(a).
Retirement Funds
The bankruptcy court correctly determined that the amounts in the inherited account were “retirement funds”. The Trustee does not dispute the bankruptcy court’s determination that, the amounts in the Dеbtor’s father’s IRA were his retirement funds prior to his death. He suggests, however, that to retain their status as retirement funds under
Exempt from Taxation
The Debtor’s inherited account is exempt from taxation under Internal Revenue Code
Bankruptcy Code
Bankruptcy Code
[a] direct transfer of retirement funds from 1 fund or aсcount that is exempt from taxation under section ... 408 ... of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, ..., shall not cease to qualify for exemрtion under ... subsection (d)(12) by reason of such direct transfer.
1Í U.S.C.
CONCLUSION
For the forеgoing reasons, we affirm the decision of the bankruptcy court.
Notes
. The Honorable Dennis D. O'Brien, United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota.
. In fact, the beneficiary of an inherited account may not treat the account as his or her own by making contributions to it оr rolling over the account into another retirement plan.
See
.
But see In re Chilton,