History
  • No items yet
midpage
966 N.W.2d 668
Iowa Ct. App.
2021
Read the full case

Background

  • Married 1991; 28-year marriage; parties aged 60 (Larry) and 58 (Angela) at trial; three adult children (youngest still in school).
  • Angela was primary earner (NP with six-figure income recent years); Larry ran a small construction business with modest historical earnings and qualified for Social Security disability after 2017 cancer surgery and hand nerve damage.
  • Several student loans for the children were taken during the marriage; parents had co-signed or otherwise supported the loans and expected the children to repay them.
  • District court recapitulation treated children’s student-loan balances as marital debt and assigned them to Angela, resulting in an equalization payment of $31,400 from Angela to Larry.
  • District court awarded Larry traditional spousal support of $750/month (scheduled to decrease to $500 at age 67), and each party was ordered to pay their own trial attorneys’ fees; appellate fees were not determined.
  • Parties appealed/cross-appealed property division, spousal support, and fee determinations.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Larry) Defendant's Argument (Angela) Held
Allocation of children’s student-loan debt Loans are marital but contingent; inequitable to assign them solely to Angela because parents’ liability is speculative; district court should not reduce Angela’s net worth based on contingent debt District court properly counted the children’s loans and included the youngest $6,000 loan; loans are marital and may be assigned to Angela Modified: remove present assignment; neither party liable now; if a child defaults and a parent becomes legally liable for existing loans, parents share liability equally; equalization payment increased to $78,086 (from $31,400)
Jewelry valuation Jewelry worth $5,000, should increase Larry’s share Jewelry valueless as claimed by Angela Affirmed valuation of $0 (within evidentiary range); even Larry’s figure would not change equity of division
Spousal support amount & duration Larry requests increase to $2,601/month given earning disparity and health limits Angela seeks reduction or elimination; district court imputed income to Larry and reduced support at age 67 Award of traditional spousal support affirmed at $750/month; modification removes planned reduction at age 67—$750/month continues until death of either party or Larry’s remarriage
Attorney fees (trial & appellate) Requests trial fees and appellate fees; argues need and partial success on appeal District court denied trial fees; Angela opposes appellate fee award Trial fees: denial affirmed (no abuse of discretion). Appellate fees: remanded—court awards Larry 60% of reasonable & necessary appellate fees; district court to quantify. Appellants share appellate costs 40/60 (Larry/Angela).

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Marriage of McDermott, 827 N.W.2d 671 (Iowa 2013) (de novo review of property distribution but weight given to trial court credibility findings)
  • In re Marriage of Gust, 858 N.W.2d 402 (Iowa 2015) (standards and factors for awarding traditional spousal support)
  • In re Marriage of Mann, 943 N.W.2d 15 (Iowa 2020) (spousal-support analysis where lifestyle choices affected earning capacity)
  • In re Marriage of Sullins, 715 N.W.2d 242 (Iowa 2006) (trial attorney-fee award reviewed for abuse of discretion; fees depend on parties’ abilities to pay)
  • In re Marriage of Okland, 699 N.W.2d 260 (Iowa 2005) (factors for awarding appellate attorney fees)
  • In re Marriage of Keener, 728 N.W.2d 188 (Iowa 2007) (valuation findings will not be disturbed if within evidence range)
  • In re Marriage of Conley, 284 N.W.2d 220 (Iowa 1978) (property division need not be mathematically exact to be equitable)
  • In re Marriage of Heiar, 954 N.W.2d 464 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020) (remand to district court to determine reasonable appellate fees)
  • Smela v. Smela, 367 N.W.2d 426 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985) (divorce court cannot adjudicate rights of third-party creditors; ruling affects only parties’ reciprocal obligations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re the Marriage of Towne
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Iowa
Date Published: Jul 21, 2021
Citations: 966 N.W.2d 668; 20-0829
Docket Number: 20-0829
Court Abbreviation: Iowa Ct. App.
Log In
    In re the Marriage of Towne, 966 N.W.2d 668