History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re the Marriage of Joan Blaser Baenziger and Gregory Paul Baenziger Upon the Petition of Joan Blaser Baenziger, and Concerning Gregory Paul Baenziger
15-0457
| Iowa Ct. App. | Oct 26, 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Gregory and Joan Baenziger married in 1999 and executed a prenuptial agreement; no children of the marriage.
  • Joan (≈59) suffers physical and mental-health conditions and faced imminent double hip replacement surgery; unemployed at trial. Gregory (≈61) was employed earning ~$110,000 with potential furlough.
  • The parties had significant debt and limited assets.
  • Joan petitioned for dissolution in April 2014; trial in Nov. 2014; decree entered Feb. 2015.
  • The decree awarded Joan: one-half of any earnings from books Gregory authored during the marriage, alimony of $1,800/month for 25 months, and approximately $18,000 in attorney fees. Gregory appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Joan) Defendant's Argument (Gregory) Held
Division of book earnings authored by Gregory during marriage Court should split earnings (district court did so) Prenuptial agreement grants Gregory sole entitlement to earnings from his individual work Modified: Gregory entitled to proceeds per prenup; no equal split
Alimony amount/duration Alimony appropriate given length of marriage, Joan's health, limited earning capacity Award excessive given Gregory's furlough and limited ability to pay Affirmed: $1,800/month for 25 months appropriate considering statutory factors
Trial attorney fees (district court award of ~$18,000 to Joan) Fees fair; based on parties' relative abilities to pay Unfair because Gregory faces furlough, debts, few assets Affirmed: district court did not abuse discretion in awarding about half of Joan's fees
Appellate attorney fees Joan requested fees on appeal Gregory opposed Denied: appellate fees not awarded to Joan

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Marriage of Applegate, 567 N.W.2d 671 (Iowa Ct. App. 1997) (premarital agreements are favored and binding absent fraud, mistake, or undue influence)
  • In re Marriage of Gust, 858 N.W.2d 402 (Iowa 2015) (de novo review in dissolution matters; trial court factual findings given weight)
  • In re Marriage of Weidner, 338 N.W.2d 351 (Iowa 1983) (decisions in dissolution require focus on particular circumstances of the parties)
  • In re Marriage of Okland, 699 N.W.2d 260 (Iowa 2005) (factors for awarding appellate attorney fees)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re the Marriage of Joan Blaser Baenziger and Gregory Paul Baenziger Upon the Petition of Joan Blaser Baenziger, and Concerning Gregory Paul Baenziger
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Iowa
Date Published: Oct 26, 2016
Docket Number: 15-0457
Court Abbreviation: Iowa Ct. App.