In re Sofia M. CA2/2
B334606
Cal. Ct. App.Mar 11, 2025Background
- The Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) filed a dependency petition asserting Sofia M. and her half-sister were at risk due to parental domestic violence.
- The juvenile court found the allegations true, declared Sofia M. a dependent, and removed her from her father's (M.M.) custody, placing her with her mother under DCFS supervision.
- M.M. was granted only monitored visitation and ordered to participate in domestic violence and parenting programs.
- M.M. appealed the court’s jurisdictional findings and dispositional orders.
- While the appeal was pending, the juvenile court terminated jurisdiction, awarded sole physical and legal custody to Sofia’s mother, and entered an exit order granting M.M. limited visitation.
- M.M. did not appeal the order terminating jurisdiction or the exit order; the appellate court therefore considered whether the original appeal was now moot.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mootness of appeal after dependency case exit | Appeal is moot; no relief | Findings adversely affect custody, visitation, and reputation | Appeal is moot; no effective relief possible |
| Discretionary review for stigmatizing findings | Not warranted | Seeks relief due to alleged stigma and ongoing effect | Discretionary review not exercised |
Key Cases Cited
- In re D.P., 14 Cal.5th 266 (Cal. 2023) (clarifies mootness in dependency appeals and test for effective relief)
- In re Rashad D., 63 Cal.App.5th 156 (Cal. Ct. App. 2021) (termination of jurisdiction generally makes appeal moot)
- In re N.S., 245 Cal.App.4th 53 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016) (effectiveness of relief in dependency appeals)
