midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
490 B.R. 607
Bankr. D.N.M.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtors Dr. Robert H. Quinn, Jr. and Stephanie S. Quinn filed Chapter 7 on January 11, 2012 seeking discharge of about $700,000 of unsecured debt amid substantial real estate liabilities.
  • UST sought dismissal for “cause” under 11 U.S.C. § 707(a) or, in the alternative, conversion to Chapter 11; final evidentiary hearing held December 5, 2012.
  • Court recognized lack of good faith as a potential basis for “cause” under § 707(a) but limited it by two principles to prevent improper value judgments about relief.
  • Debtors’ schedules disclosed substantial assets and non-consumer debt; pre- and post-petition conduct included pre-petition debt management attempts and lifestyle elements alleged to be lavish.
  • Court found that, viewed in totality, the combination of factors did not rise to “egregious” bad faith necessary for dismissal and declined conversion to Chapter 11.
  • The decision notes that § 707(a) grounds are nonexclusive and that bad faith may be considered within a flexible, case-by-case “totality of the circumstances” approach.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether lack of good faith can justify dismissal under § 707(a). UST asserts lack of good faith can be cause for dismissal. Quinns argue no good-faith requirement exists for Chapter 7 relief. Yes, but only in egregious cases and within a flexible, case-specific standard.
Whether the evidence supports dismissal for cause under § 707(a) given debtors’ financial position and conduct. UST contends factors like high income and lavish lifestyle show bad faith. Debtors’ income and lifestyle not enough to constitute cause when coupled with lack of egregious misconduct. Not sufficient to dismiss for cause under § 707(a) in this case.
Whether the case should be converted to Chapter 11 under § 706(b) as an alternative. UST seeks conversion to maximize creditors’ recovery. Debtors’ case not suitable for conversion; dismissal avoided. Court denied conversion; not appropriate to compel Chapter 11.

Key Cases Cited

  • Padilla v. U.S. Trustee, 212 F.3d 1184 (9th Cir. 2000) (lack of good faith as basis for dismissal under § 707(a))
  • In re Zick, 931 F.2d 1124 (6th Cir. 1991) (greatly influential on the good faith/dismissal standard under § 707(a))
  • Huckfeldt, 39 F.3d 829 (8th Cir. 1994) (dismissal for lack of good faith and its limits under § 707(a))
  • In re Lombardo, 370 B.R. 506 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y. 2007) (multifactor test for bad-faith filing under § 707(a))
  • In re Keobapha, 279 B.R. 49 (Bankr.D. Conn. 2002) (fourteen-factor test for bad-faith filing under § 707(a))
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Quinn
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico
Date Published: Dec 28, 2012
Citations: 490 B.R. 607; 2012 WL 6737484; 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 5937; No. 7-12-10079 JA
Docket Number: No. 7-12-10079 JA
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. D.N.M.
Log In