History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Marriage of Dougall
316 P.3d 591
Ariz. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Dissolution of marriage in 2008; spousal maintenance set at $750/mo; property division including real property interests in two parcels.
  • In 2011, court reduced maintenance to $500/mo; judgments entered for arrearages and property value, with later affirmations.
  • 2012 enforcement petitions; Richard purports credits for debts and loans; court ordered $200/mo toward arrearages from Richard’s income, plus a VA disability benefits wage-withholding order.
  • Trial court treated Richard’s VA disability benefits as income for arrearage calculation; income totaled about $3,918/mo.
  • § 25-530 enacted July 2010; facially prohibits considering federal disability benefits in determining spousal maintenance; issue is whether it precludes arrearage payments.
  • Court vacates the VA benefits income-withholding order, but holds that VA benefits may be considered as income for arrearage determinations; otherwise affirms orders.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether § 25-530 precludes consideration of VA benefits for arrearage payments Dougall argues benefits are protected from seizure and should not fund arrearages Dougall contends benefits should not be used to satisfy arrearages per § 25-530 § 25-530 does not preclude considering VA benefits for arrearages
Whether the court’s income-withholding order against VA benefits was proper Richard contends the order violates § 25-530 and federal law Court may order payments from other income sources; VA withholdings not required Income-withholding order from VA benefits vacated; alternative payment requirement remains valid

Key Cases Cited

  • Rose v. Rose, 481 U.S. 619 (U.S. (1987)) (veteran benefits not shielded from state court income orders for support)
  • Downing v. Downing, 228 Ariz. 298 (Ariz. App. 2011) (statute applies to determining maintenance; applied to modification and arrearages context)
  • Repash v. Repash, 528 A.2d 744 (Vt. 1987) (disability benefits may be considered as income for maintenance awards)
  • Priessman, In re Marriage of Priessman, 228 Ariz. 336 (Ariz. App. 2011) (AZ court approved considering VA benefits for maintenance modifications)
  • Goglia v. Bodnar, 156 Ariz. 12 (Ariz. App. 1987) (review constrained to Rule 60(c) issues; credit considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Marriage of Dougall
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Arizona
Date Published: Dec 18, 2013
Citation: 316 P.3d 591
Docket Number: 2 CA-CV 2013-0056
Court Abbreviation: Ariz. Ct. App.