History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Le
335 S.W.3d 808
Tex. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Relator Michele Le and her brother own Lindsay Realty Services, LLC, which manages condo units at a Houston complex.
  • Luong Le filed suit in July 2008 against Michele Le and related entities for fraud and fiduciary breaches in condo management.
  • Discovery disputes arose: deposition notices, duces tecum, and requests for QuickBooks data; relator supplied some items but not others.
  • The trial court sanctioned relator for discovery abuses, including a $500 sanction, and ordered production of records and continued deposition.
  • Plaintiff later sought death-penalty (severe) sanctions and significant costs, claiming flagrant bad-faith discovery abuses by relator.
  • On January 21, 2011 the court issued the death-penalty sanctions order; an amended order on February 15, 2011 kept the same sanctions but adjusted payment timing.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether death-penalty sanctions were an abuse of discretion Le contends the record is incomplete and sanctions are unjust. Carter argues discovery abuses justify severe sanctions. Denied mandamus; record inadequate to conclude abuse.
Whether monetary sanctions payable before final judgment were proper without predicate relief Le argues payment pre-judgment imperils continued litigation violating Braden. Carter maintains sanctions proper despite pre-judgment payment. Denied mandamus; predicate request not shown.

Key Cases Cited

  • TransAmerican Nat. Gas Corp. v. Powell, 811 S.W.2d 913 (Tex. 1991) (death-penalty sanctions require flagrant bad faith or disregard)
  • Braden v. Downey, 811 S.W.2d 922 (Tex. 1991) (predicates for pre-judgment sanctions and adequate remedy by appeal)
  • In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124 (Tex. 2004) (mandamus relief standards for clear abuse of discretion)
  • In re Sanders, 153 S.W.3d 54 (Tex. 2004) (review of conflicting evidence standard in mandamus)
  • Prime Group, Inc. v. O'Neill, 848 S.W.2d 376 (Tex. App. Houston [14th Dist.] 1993) (predicates for relief when pre-judgment sanctions are challenged)
  • Jefa Co. v. Mustang Tractor and Equip. Co., 868 S.W.2d 905 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1994) (consideration of history of litigation in death-penalty sanctions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Le
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Mar 3, 2011
Citation: 335 S.W.3d 808
Docket Number: 14-11-00132-CV, 14-11-00156-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.