History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re L.R.F.
977 N.E.2d 138
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • This is an Ohio Court of Appeals, Eighth Appellate District, reviewing a juvenile delinquency adjudication for rape.
  • Complaint filed June 28, 2011 alleging that on October 9, 2007, appellant forced T.H., then a minor, to engage in sexual conduct by force or threat of force.
  • Trial occurred September 21, 2011; victim testified she was nine at trial and described being coerced after a threat to disclose kissing another boy.
  • Victim later disclosed to her mother that she performed oral sex on appellant after discovering a sexual text message.
  • The juvenile court adjudicated delinquent and committed appellant to the Department of Youth Services for at least one year; appellant appeals on three assignments of error; the court reverses and remands to vacate the delinquency adjudication.
  • The appellate court sustains the first assignment of error and finds the others moot, ordering remand with costs to appellee.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of evidence to prove force or threat of force under 2907.02(A)(2). Appellant contends the state failed to prove force or threat of force. State argues evidence supports force given the circumstances. Insufficient evidence; adjudication reversed.
Manifests weight of the evidence (if not sufficient on sufficiency). Appellant argues weight supports conviction. State maintains weight supports the verdict. Moot after reversal on sufficiency.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Labus, 102 Ohio St. 26 (1921) (force varies with age/relationship in rape cases; parental relation can support force concept)
  • State v. Eskridge, 38 Ohio St.3d 56 (1988) (force can be psychological under parental authority)
  • State v. Schaim, 65 Ohio St.3d 51 (1992) (examines force with non-parental victims and pattern of abuse; requires overt force or threat if not dependent)
  • State v. Dye, 82 Ohio St.3d 323 (1998) (position of authority over child allows force without explicit threat)
  • In re N.K., 2003-Ohio-7059 (2003) (threat of parental ostracism not force)
  • In re D.L., 2012-Ohio-1796 (2012) (distinguishes cases with physical force)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re L.R.F.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 20, 2012
Citation: 977 N.E.2d 138
Docket Number: 97905
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.