History
  • No items yet
midpage
2014 Ohio 3596
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • M.J. (mother) gave birth to D.S. on Nov. 4, 2012; Cuyahoga Job and Family Services filed to establish paternity and child support on July 9, 2013.
  • Genetic testing showed D.S. Sr. was the father (99.99%). D.S. Sr. admitted paternity in court.
  • Magistrate designated M.J. as the residential parent, found the child receives county benefits, and imputed M.J.’s potential annual earnings at $13,750.
  • Magistrate found D.S. Sr. voluntarily unemployed/underemployed and imputed potential annual earnings of $12,246; he has five other children; the guideline worksheet produced a $50/month support obligation.
  • M.J. objected to the magistrate’s computation (challenging imputation and deductions for other children); the trial court overruled the objections and adopted the magistrate’s decision.
  • On appeal, the Eighth District affirmed, concluding M.J. failed to provide the hearing transcript to challenge factual findings and that the court’s imputation and calculations were within its discretion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the court erred by imputing income and allowing deductions for D.S. Sr.’s other children when calculating child support M.J.: magistrate incorrectly imputed income and assessed unsupported deductions for D.S. Sr.’s other children Cuyahoga JFS / D.S. Sr.: magistrate’s imputation and worksheet calculations were proper; supporting facts are in the record Court affirmed: trial court did not abuse discretion; appellant failed to supply transcript needed to rebut factual findings, so proceedings presumed regular

Key Cases Cited

  • Booth v. Booth, 44 Ohio St.3d 142 (Ohio 1989) (standard that trial court has broad discretion in child support matters)
  • Blakemore v. Blakemore, 5 Ohio St.3d 217 (Ohio 1983) (definition of abuse of discretion)
  • Marker v. Grimm, 65 Ohio St.3d 139 (Ohio 1992) (guideline worksheet presumptively correct; deviation rules)
  • Rock v. Cabral, 67 Ohio St.3d 108 (Ohio 1993) (imputation of income is within trial court discretion)
  • Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories, 61 Ohio St.2d 197 (Ohio 1980) (appellant’s duty to provide transcript; missing transcript leads to presumption of regularity)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re D.S.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 21, 2014
Citations: 2014 Ohio 3596; 101012
Docket Number: 101012
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    In re D.S., 2014 Ohio 3596