midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2014 Ohio 3571
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • PCCS had ongoing involvement with the Bieber family since 2005; emergency shelter care of four children occurred on Aug 15, 2012.
  • Adjudicatory/dispositional time waiver was signed by Mother on Oct 31, 2012 due to sexual abuse investigations.
  • PCCS filed for permanent custody on Apr 10, 2013; hearings occurred Aug–Oct 2013 with extensive evidence.
  • Children were placed with nonparental caregivers (Walkers for M.B./K.B.; McCormick then Burden for Da.B./De.B.) with visitation and separation issues.
  • Dr. Gary Wolfgang diagnosed Mother with narcissistic personality disorder, prognosis guarded; Mother disputed abuse findings and opposed services.
  • Trial court granted permanent custody to PCCS on Jan 21, 2014; Mother appealed asserting best-interests and time-limit challenges.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Best interests of the children in granting permanent custody Mother contends the court erred in best-interests finding Court properly weighed evidence showing PCCS custody is best Supported by competent, credible evidence; overruled
Timeliness under RC 2151.414(A)(2) for issuing the permanent-custody order Delay of 283 days breached time limits and voided jurisdiction Time limits are directory; delay does not affect jurisdiction; writ remedy available Delay not fatal; order affirmed
Waiver of adjudicatory/dispositional hearing Waiver prevented challenge to placement and adjudication Waiver was valid; invited error and supports current ruling waived; no reversal on this basis
Adequacy of findings supporting best-interests decision Court failed to make explicit findings tying to statutory factors Explicit findings not required unless requested; substantial evidence supports decision Not required to set explicit factual findings; evidence supports result
Relief standards for claims of abuse-dependency adjudications Incidents unresolved due to lack of adjudication timing Adjudicatory/non-adjudicatory timing waived; focus on disposition and best interests Not dispositive to outcome; permanent custody affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • C.E. Morris Co. v. Foley Constr., 54 Ohio St.2d 279 (Ohio 1978) (clear, convincing standard not required for weight of evidence; supports factual weight)
  • In re K.H., 2014-Ohio-1594 (Ohio) (time limits under RC 2151.414(A)(2) are directory; remedy via procedendo)
  • In re Davis, 84 Ohio St.3d 520 (Ohio 1999) (time limits in juvenile-handling proceedings; due-process implications clarified)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re D.B.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 15, 2014
Citations: 2014 Ohio 3571; 14-CA-0004, 14-CA-0005, 14-CA-0006, 14-CA-0007
Docket Number: 14-CA-0004, 14-CA-0005, 14-CA-0006, 14-CA-0007
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In