In Re Christopher C.
129 Conn. App. 55
| Conn. App. Ct. | 2011Background
- The minor child resided with his mother and her boyfriend prior to involvement by the Commissioner due to unexplained, suspicious injuries.
- The Commissioner filed a neglect petition; the mother pled nolo contendere; the respondent father remained silent as a noncustodial parent.
- The trial court adjudicated the child neglected because he lived under conditions injurious to his well-being and due to the father's criminal history.
- During dispositional proceedings, the paternal grandmother sought guardianship; the mother also sought guardianship, which the court denied.
- The court found the grandmother unsuitable because she did not believe in the respondent’s culpability and could be unduly loyal to her son, risking the child’s safety.
- The court committed the child to the custody of the Commissioner; the respondent appealed challenging guardianship denial and alleged ineffective assistance of counsel.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether grandmother was a suitable guardian. | Respondent argues grandmother was suitable. | Grandmother argued suitability; court misapplied standard. | Grandmother unsuitability supported by record. |
| Whether the trial court’s guardianship denial rested on an improper basis. | Respondent claims lack of non-opinionated basis for denial. | Court considered grandmother’s belief about respondent’s guilt and loyalty risk. | Record supports the court’s basis for denial. |
| Whether the respondent received ineffective assistance of counsel. | Respondent contends counsel failed to cross-examine, contact witnesses, and allow testimony. | No record showing ineffective performance prejudicial to outcome. | No ineffective-assistance shown; record insufficient to prove prejudice. |
Key Cases Cited
- In re Kamari C-L., 122 Conn.App. 815 (Conn. App. 2010) (deference to trial findings; standard for sufficiency of evidence)
- In re Matthew S., 60 Conn.App. 127 (Conn. App. 2000) (ineffective assistance standard; need prejudice shows)
- In re Amanda A., 58 Conn. App. 451 (Conn. App. 2000) (record adequacy requirement for ineffective-assistance claim)
