History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Christopher C.
129 Conn. App. 55
| Conn. App. Ct. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • The minor child resided with his mother and her boyfriend prior to involvement by the Commissioner due to unexplained, suspicious injuries.
  • The Commissioner filed a neglect petition; the mother pled nolo contendere; the respondent father remained silent as a noncustodial parent.
  • The trial court adjudicated the child neglected because he lived under conditions injurious to his well-being and due to the father's criminal history.
  • During dispositional proceedings, the paternal grandmother sought guardianship; the mother also sought guardianship, which the court denied.
  • The court found the grandmother unsuitable because she did not believe in the respondent’s culpability and could be unduly loyal to her son, risking the child’s safety.
  • The court committed the child to the custody of the Commissioner; the respondent appealed challenging guardianship denial and alleged ineffective assistance of counsel.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether grandmother was a suitable guardian. Respondent argues grandmother was suitable. Grandmother argued suitability; court misapplied standard. Grandmother unsuitability supported by record.
Whether the trial court’s guardianship denial rested on an improper basis. Respondent claims lack of non-opinionated basis for denial. Court considered grandmother’s belief about respondent’s guilt and loyalty risk. Record supports the court’s basis for denial.
Whether the respondent received ineffective assistance of counsel. Respondent contends counsel failed to cross-examine, contact witnesses, and allow testimony. No record showing ineffective performance prejudicial to outcome. No ineffective-assistance shown; record insufficient to prove prejudice.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Kamari C-L., 122 Conn.App. 815 (Conn. App. 2010) (deference to trial findings; standard for sufficiency of evidence)
  • In re Matthew S., 60 Conn.App. 127 (Conn. App. 2000) (ineffective assistance standard; need prejudice shows)
  • In re Amanda A., 58 Conn. App. 451 (Conn. App. 2000) (record adequacy requirement for ineffective-assistance claim)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Christopher C.
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: May 24, 2011
Citation: 129 Conn. App. 55
Docket Number: AC 32776
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.