midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
478 B.R. 73
Bankr. D. Mass.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • OneUnited Bank filed motion to dismiss CSAME's Chapter 11 case under 11 U.S.C. §1112(b)(1) for cause due to ineligibility under §109(d).
  • CSAME is an incorporated congregation of the AME Church in Massachusetts, continuously in good standing with AME since 1839.
  • CSAME holds real estate, operates a church, and has two default loans from OneUnited: the RRC Loan and the Church Loan.
  • AMe Church Governance: Book of Discipline states property held in trust for AMEC; disputes arise over control and authority within AME polity.
  • First Episcopal District guaranteed the RRC Loan; discussions at hearing about bishop authority to move funds between entities.
  • Court determines CSAME is a Massachusetts corporation under §101(9) and thus an eligible debtor under §109(d); nominee-trust concerns are moot.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is CSAME an eligible debtor under §109(d)? OneUnited contends CSAME is a trust, not a corporation. CSAME argues it is a Massachusetts corporate entity with its own purposes. CSAME is a corporation under §101(9); eligible under §109(d).
Does nominee-trust status render CSAME ineligible? OneUnited claims CSAME serves as trustee of a nominee/non-business trust for AMEC. CSAME concedes possible trustee role but maintains corporate status; trust status is not dispositive. Nominee-trust ineligibility not reached; corporation status controls and is eligible.
Do AME Book of Discipline provisions create a non-business trust that affects eligibility? Book of Discipline creates trust-like control over CSAME's assets benefiting AMEC/AME Church. Such provisions govern internal church matters and do not deprive CSAME of corporate status. Book provisions do not strip CSAME of corporate status; eligibility remains.
Would ineligibility require dismissal under §1112(b)(1)? If CSAME were ineligible, dismissal would be proper. CSAME is eligible, so §1112(b)(1) dismissal is not warranted. Motion to dismiss denied; CSAME qualifies as a debtor.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Village Green Realty Trust, 113 B.R. 105 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1990) (trustee status of nominee trust discussed in eligibility context)
  • In re Pittsfield Weaving Co., 393 B.R. 271 (Bankr. D. N.H. 2008) (to show burden of proof on entity asserting cause for dismissal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Charles Street African Methodist Episcopal Church
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
Date Published: Sep 11, 2012
Citations: 478 B.R. 73; 68 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 181; 2012 WL 3987915; 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 4192; No. 12-12292-FJB
Docket Number: No. 12-12292-FJB
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. D. Mass.
Log In
    In re Charles Street African Methodist Episcopal Church, 478 B.R. 73