midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
252 P.3d 556
Colo. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Mother engaged Lutheran Family Services to place child for adoption and falsely claimed she did not know the father's identity or whereabouts.
  • LFS filed an expedited relinquishment in Larimer County and provided publication notice to the allegedly unknown father.
  • District court found father in default for failure to respond to publication and terminated both parents’ rights and granted custody to LFS for adoption.
  • Mother had actual knowledge of father’s identity and whereabouts and communicated with him during relinquishment proceedings, contrary to representations.
  • Adoption decree entered in Jefferson County; final decree dated June 23, 2008; child remained with adoptive parents.
  • Father filed motions alleging lack of notice and fraud, seeking relief from judgment; district court denied as time-barred.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the default termination violated due process due to lack of notice Father LFS/Intervenors Judgment void for lack of notice
Whether the judgment can be attacked despite time limits because it is void Father LFS/Intervenors Void judgments may be attacked anytime; relief granted
Whether 9-5-105(4) and Rule 60(b) bar relief when the judgment is void Father LFS/Intervenors Limitations do not apply to void judgments; relief under 60(b)(8) required
What relief and remand are proper given due process violations Father LFS/Intervenors Reverse, vacate, remand for relinguishment hearing; paternity issue if disputed

Key Cases Cited

  • Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545 (1965) (due process notice required in termination actions)
  • In re J.M.A., 240 P.3d 547 (Colo. App. 2010) (notice and due process in parental rights terminations)
  • First Nat'l Bank v. Fleisher, 2 P.3d 706 (Colo.2000) (due process; void judgments may require vacating)
  • Mason-Jares, Ltd. v. Peterson, 989 P.2d 522 (Colo. App. 1997) (due process; publication notice issues)
  • Davidson Chevrolet, Inc. v. City & County of Denver, 138 Colo. 171 (Colo.1958) (voidness when publication notice fails to meet due process)
  • In re S.O., 795 P.2d 254 (Colo.1990) (statutory timing not controlling where void judgment exists)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re C.L.S.
Court Name: Colorado Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 3, 2011
Citations: 252 P.3d 556; No. 10CA0529
Docket Number: No. 10CA0529
Court Abbreviation: Colo. Ct. App.
Log In
    In re C.L.S., 252 P.3d 556