History
  • No items yet
midpage
439 B.R. 342
Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtors BH S & B Holdings, LLC and affiliates purchased Steve & Barry's women’s clothing business in 2008 under §363.
  • Debtors filed Chapter 11 in November 2008; UST appointed a Committee and Arent Fox LLP as counsel.
  • By January 2009 Debtors closed 153 Steve & Barry's stores and pursued liquidation in Chapter 11 without a filed plan.
  • Ableco Finance LLC provided a $1 million Litigation Fund to pursue litigation claims; exclusive authority to the Committee to prosecute litigation claims.
  • Litigation funding was exhausted; Ableco declined further subordination; statute of limitations for Chapter 5 avoidance actions was near expiration (Nov. 18, 2010).
  • UST moved to convert the cases to Chapter 7 under §1112(b)(4)(A) and (J); Debtors objected; the Court granted the motion following a hearing.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether there is cause to convert under §1112(b)(4)(A) UST argues continuing losses and no rehabilitation; liquidation intent shows no viable rehabilitation. Debtors contend potential recovery from turnover and other actions may rehabilitate. Cause exists due to continuing losses and lack of rehabilitation.
Whether administrative insolvency constitutes cause UST cites unpaid administrative claims and exhausted cash collateral carve-out. Debtors argue potential Turnover and litigation could avoid insolvency. Administrative insolvency constitutes cause for conversion.
Whether failure to file a disclosure statement or plan constitutes cause under §1112(b)(4)(J) UST shows deadline passed without filed disclosure statement or plan. Debtors had extensions; exclusivity ended; no plan/statements filed. Failure to file triggered cause for conversion.
Whether conversion is more appropriate than dismissal Conversion best serves creditors/estate by enabling Chapter 7 trustee to pursue avoidance claims. Dismissal could be alternative if no estate to administer. Conversion is more appropriate.

Key Cases Cited

  • Loop Corp. v. U.S. Trustee, 379 F.3d 511 (8th Cir. 2004) (no likelihood of rehabilitation can justify conversion in some liquidating contexts)
  • In re 1031 Tax Grp., LLC, 374 B.R. 78 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2007) (must show continuing loss and absence of rehabilitation)
  • In re AdBrite Corp., 290 B.R. 209 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2003) (rehabilitation unlikely where liquidation anticipated)
  • In re Ameribuild Const. Mgmt., Inc., 399 B.R. 129 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2009) (court may consider additional grounds beyond listed §1112(b) factors)
  • In re Acme Cake Co., Inc., 2010 WL 4103761 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2010) (administrative insolvency and avoidance of claims support conversion rationale)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Bh S & B Holdings, LLC
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Date Published: Nov 18, 2010
Citations: 439 B.R. 342; 53 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 280; 2010 WL 4644440; 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 3921; 18-13577
Docket Number: 18-13577
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Log In
    In Re Bh S & B Holdings, LLC, 439 B.R. 342