midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2023 Ohio 1607
Ohio Ct. App.
2023
Read the full case

Background

  • In April 2021 Warren County Children Services (WCCS) removed six-year-old A.S. after receiving reports of parental mental-health delusions (Mother) and parental drug use (Father); A.S. was adjudicated neglected and dependent and placed with the paternal aunt (Aunt).
  • WCCS adopted a case plan requiring both parents to complete mental‑health and substance‑abuse assessments and related services; Mother was initially unreachable and later engaged only intermittently, delaying a psychological evaluation.
  • Aunt obtained temporary custody and moved for legal custody in October 2021; WCCS ultimately supported Aunt’s legal‑custody request, citing Aunt’s stable home and A.S.’s improvement while in Aunt’s care.
  • At the July 12, 2022 custody hearing Mother did not appear; the court heard testimony from Aunt, Father (who did not oppose Aunt’s custody), and the WCCS caseworker describing Mother’s ongoing mental‑health concerns and minimal contact with A.S.
  • The magistrate found legal custody to Aunt was in A.S.’s best interest; the juvenile court overruled Mother’s objections and granted legal custody to Aunt. Mother appealed, arguing the court erred in its best‑interest determination.

Issues

Issue Mother’s Argument Opposing Argument Held
Whether legal custody to Aunt was in child’s best interest under R.C. 2151.353 / best‑interest factors Mother claimed she made substantial case‑plan progress (mental‑health and substance assessments, housing, employment, psychological exam) and that factors favored reunification Agency, Aunt, and Father pointed to Mother’s persistent mental‑health issues, Mother’s prolonged absence and limited contact, and Aunt’s stable, beneficial care for A.S. Court affirmed: legal custody to Aunt was supported by a preponderance of the evidence and was not an abuse of discretion

Key Cases Cited

  • Blakemore v. Blakemore, 5 Ohio St.3d 217 (Ohio 1983) (abuse‑of‑discretion standard explanation)
  • Miller v. Miller, 37 Ohio St.3d 71 (Ohio 1988) (deference to trial court in custody determinations)
  • Eastley v. Volkman, 132 Ohio St.3d 328 (Ohio 2012) (standard for manifest‑weight review)
  • In re C.R., 108 Ohio St.3d 369 (Ohio 2006) (distinguishing legal custody from permanent custody)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re A.S.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 15, 2023
Citations: 2023 Ohio 1607; CA2022-11-074
Docket Number: CA2022-11-074
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In