In re A.D.B.
2016 Ohio 7186
Ohio Ct. App.2016Background
- Grandfather (appellant) filed three separate custody complaints seeking legal custody of his granddaughter A.D.B. (born 2010), alleging Mother's drug use and that Mother caused an injury to the child’s neck; earlier proceedings returned custody to Mother and prior complaints were voluntarily dismissed.
- The most recent complaint followed an incident where A.D.B. had an abrasion/ friction burn to her neck; hospital staff and investigators characterized the injury as minor and noncriminal; Mother testified the child caused the injury playing with a hanger.
- Grandfather admitted he made an anonymous tip that prompted a police search of the maternal grandmother’s home; no charges resulted from that search.
- Trial court held a two-day hearing in September 2015; it found Grandfather failed to prove Mother’s current substance abuse or that the injury resulted from anything other than the explanation accepted by hospital and law enforcement.
- The trial court denied Grandfather’s request for drug testing, ruled his custody complaint frivolous, and awarded Mother attorney fees; Grandfather appealed, raising five assignments of error.
Issues
| Issue | Grandfather's Argument | Mother's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Denial of motion to drug-test Mother | Grounds to suspect current drug use based on prior incidents and affidavits | Evidence showed no current substance abuse; affidavits were dated/old and not persuasive | Denial affirmed — no sufficient evidence of current substance abuse to justify testing |
| 2. Release of police chief as witness | Trial court improperly released Fairfield Police Chief Dickey and denied time to review file | Chief testified on first day; Grandfather closed his case and provided only partial transcript | Affirmed — no error; appellant’s partial record limits review |
| 3. Exclusion of investigator’s testimony about doctor’s statements | Compston should have been allowed to recount Dr. Shapiro’s statements about photos | Those out-of-court statements are hearsay and inadmissible | Affirmed — properly excluded as hearsay |
| 4. Manifest weight challenge to custody denial | Trial court ignored clear evidence Mother is unfit | Trial court credited witness testimony that Mother is a suitable, caring parent; no credible evidence of unsuitability | Affirmed — findings not against manifest weight; Grandfather failed to prove parental unsuitability |
| 5. Award of attorney fees to Mother for frivolous conduct | Award improper; claims made in good faith to protect child | Grandfather repeatedly filed unsupported, harassing claims; conduct met statutory definition of frivolous | Affirmed — trial court properly found frivolous conduct and awarded fees |
Key Cases Cited
- Blakemore v. Blakemore, 5 Ohio St.3d 217 (Ohio 1983) (standard for appellate review of abuse of discretion)
- Davis v. Flickinger, 77 Ohio St.3d 415 (Ohio 1997) (custody modification requires substantial change in circumstances)
- In re Perales, 52 Ohio St.2d 89 (Ohio 1977) (nonparent custody claim requires showing parent unsuitability)
- Wiltberger v. Davis, 110 Ohio App.3d 46 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996) (appellate review de novo on questions of law)
