midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
627 B.R. 305
Bankr. W.D. Pa.
2021
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtors Jonathan Hawranko and William Roetter co-owned Roetters Painting, LLC, which was signatory to a CBA requiring employer fringe-benefit contributions to multiemployer Funds governed by Trust Agreements.
  • From 2016–2019 the Company failed to remit required fringe contributions; the Funds sued and obtained a default judgment against the Company; Debtors filed Chapter 7 in May 2020.
  • Count I (employee wage withholdings $11,720.45) was stipulated nondischargeable under §523(a)(4) and resolved in favor of the Funds.
  • Count II (disputed unpaid fringe contributions ~ $158,481 plus interest) alleged defalcation by Debtors while acting in a fiduciary capacity; plaintiff sought summary judgment.
  • Key factual points: Debtors jointly managed the two-person company; both signed checks; Debtors periodically withdrew substantial ‘‘guaranteed payments’’ as personal compensation; monthly contribution reports were prepared and submitted without full payment.
  • The Court considered whether unpaid contributions were ERISA plan assets (and thus created a trust res) and whether any fiduciary status preexisted the nonpayment such that §523(a)(4) nondischargeability applies.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether unpaid fringe contributions are ERISA "plan assets" and when they become assets Funds: Trust Agreement language vests title in Trustees so unpaid contributions are plan assets (accounts receivable) prior to payment Debtors: Contributions not plan assets until they are due under CBA/Trust Agreements Held: Contributions become plan assets only when they are due and owing; pre-due receivables are not plan assets.
Whether Debtors were fiduciaries under ERISA and §523(a)(4) with respect to unpaid contributions Funds: Debtors exercised control/authority over company funds and reports, making them fiduciaries under ERISA and §523(a)(4) Debtors: ERISA fiduciary status (if any) is distinct and narrower under §523(a)(4); any fiduciary role arose only when contributions became due Held: Even if ERISA fiduciaries after contributions became due, that fiduciary status sprang from the failure to pay and therefore does not satisfy §523(a)(4)’s narrower fiduciary requirement.
Whether a trust sufficient for §523(a)(4) existed prior to the wrongful act Funds: Trust Agreements created an express/technical trust in favor of the Funds Debtors: No preexisting trust res or duties owed by the individuals separate from company obligations Held: No trust relationship existed prior to the nonpayment; the alleged trust would have arisen from the very act creating the debt, which Davis forbids for §523(a)(4).
Whether Debtors' conduct constitutes defalcation (culpable state of mind) Funds: Debtors deliberately paid themselves while failing to pay contributions, showing culpability/gross recklessness Debtors: Withdrawals were compensation; reasonableness disputed; factual issues remain Held: Court found factual disputes as to defalcation; because fiduciary status under §523(a)(4) was lacking, defalcation analysis was moot for summary judgment purposes.

Key Cases Cited

  • Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co., 293 U.S. 328 (Sup. Ct.) (trust must preexist wrongdoing to support nondischargeability)
  • Bucci v. McReynolds, 493 F.3d 635 (6th Cir.) (ERISA fiduciary status that springs from nonpayment cannot satisfy §523(a)(4))
  • Hunter v. Philpott, 373 F.3d 873 (8th Cir.) (fiduciary status must preexist the act creating the debt)
  • Bos v. Board of Trustees, 795 F.3d 1006 (9th Cir.) (similar holding that trust cannot arise from the wrongful act for §523(a)(4))
  • Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A., 569 U.S. 267 (Sup. Ct.) (defalcation includes culpable mental state: knowledge or gross recklessness)
  • Cioppa v. Laborers Combined Funds of W. Pa., 346 F. Supp. 2d 765 (W.D. Pa.) (construed trust language making certain delinquent contributions plan assets)
  • Molinaro Corp. v. Laborers' Combined Funds of W. Pa., 234 F. Supp. 3d 660 (W.D. Pa.) (unpaid contributions become plan assets at the moment they become due)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: I.U.P.A.T. District Council No. 57 Combined Funds v. Hawranko
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 6, 2021
Citations: 627 B.R. 305; 20-02116
Docket Number: 20-02116
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. W.D. Pa.
Log In
    I.U.P.A.T. District Council No. 57 Combined Funds v. Hawranko, 627 B.R. 305