History
  • No items yet
midpage
482 S.W.3d 184
Tex. App.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Longview sued Huff, D’Angelo, and related Huff entities for fiduciary breaches including corporate-opportunity usurpation and loyalty-based competition.
  • Longview investigated Eagle Ford opportunities via Lober’s analysis and discussions with land brokers Gooden and Ford.
  • Huff (HEF) funded and controlled some of Riley-Huff Energy; Riley-Huff began acquiring Eagle Ford leases.
  • Longview presented a proposal to buy Eagle Ford acreage, but Huff allegedly blocked funding; Riley-Huff subsequently acquired similar leases.
  • Longview alleged Huff and D’Angelo used confidential information and formed Riley-Huff to exploit the Eagle Ford opportunity for themselves.
  • The jury found both Huff and D’Angelo breached their fiduciary duties; trial court entered a constructive trust and a $95.5 million award; appeal challenged on legal-sufficiency and pleading grounds.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether there was a cognizable corporate opportunity Longview had an expectancy in the Eagle Ford opportunity No cognizable corporate opportunity existed; it was only a generic strategy No legally sufficient evidence of an actual corporate opportunity.
Whether a separate competition claim was pleaded and properly submitted Competition was pled as part of fiduciary duty breaches No separate competition claim; improper submission Longview failed to plead a separate competition claim; submission was harmful.

Key Cases Cited

  • Guth v. Loft, Inc., 5 A.2d 503 (Del.1939) (corporate-opportunity doctrine governs loyalty duties; balance of factors; two-step analysis.)
  • Broz v. Cellular Info. Sys., 673 A.2d 148 (Del.1996) (Guth corollary; no single factor dispositive; balance four factors.)
  • Johnston v. Greene, 121 A.2d 919 (Del.1956) (tie between opportunity and corporate business necessary.)
  • Colorado & Utah Coal Co. v. Harris, 49 P.2d 429 (Colo.1935) (test for expectancy in opportunities; board rejection can bar claims.)
  • Thorpe ex rel. Castleman v. CERBCO, Inc., 676 A.2d 436 (Del.1996) (two-step corporate-opportunity framework; imperative to disgorge profits.)
  • McGowan v. Ferro, 859 A.2d 1012 (Del.2004) (corporate opportunity; safe-harbor and nexus considerations.)
  • Field v. Allyn, 457 A.2d 1089 (Del.1983) (recognizes two-step approach; no automatic entitlement to opportunities.)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Huff Energy Fund, L.P. v. Longview Energy Co.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Nov 25, 2015
Citations: 482 S.W.3d 184; 2015 WL 7731763; 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 12094; No. 04-12-00630-CV
Docket Number: No. 04-12-00630-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
Log In
    Huff Energy Fund, L.P. v. Longview Energy Co., 482 S.W.3d 184