Hidden Cove Park and Marina v. Lexington Insurance Company
4:17-cv-00193
E.D. Tex.May 16, 2017Background
- Two Texas plaintiffs (Hidden Cove Park & Marina and MQTXM LLC d/b/a Texoma Park & Marina) sued Lexington Insurance, AIG Claims, adjuster Glenn Hollmuller, and others alleging improper claim handling after 2015 storm damage to insured properties in Denton and Grayson Counties.
- Plaintiffs asserted breach of contract, violations of Texas Insurance Code and Unfair Claims Practices Act, and bad-faith/breach of duty claims; adjuster Hollmuller was sued individually for unfair settlement practices.
- Plaintiffs settled with co-defendant Champion (a Texas citizen); defendants then removed the action to federal court asserting complete diversity between the remaining parties.
- Plaintiffs moved to remand, arguing lack of diversity because Hollmuller (an in-state citizen) remained a defendant; defendants argued Hollmuller was improperly joined.
- The court analyzed improper joinder under the Fifth Circuit standard, applying a Rule 12(b)(6)-type plausibility inquiry to determine whether there was any reasonable basis for recovery against Hollmuller.
- The court found plaintiffs’ allegations against Hollmuller were conclusory boilerplate (no factual allegations of independent, actionable conduct by the adjuster) and dismissed Hollmuller without prejudice; remand was denied.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether federal diversity jurisdiction exists after dismissal/settlement of a non-diverse co-defendant and/or improper joinder of in-state adjuster | Hollmuller is a proper defendant; presence defeats diversity and requires remand | Hollmuller was improperly joined; his Texas citizenship should be disregarded and diversity exists | Removal proper; remand denied because Hollmuller was improperly joined and dismissed |
| Whether Hollmuller can be individually liable under Texas Insurance Code for unfair settlement practices | Adjuster can be liable individually under Tex. Ins. Code when pleaded with factual specificity | Plaintiffs pled only boilerplate; no plausible factual basis to hold Hollmuller personally liable | Held that pleadings lack factual allegations showing independent actionable conduct by Hollmuller; claim not plausible |
| Proper standard for evaluating improper joinder | Plaintiffs rely on state-law claims surviving against in-state defendant | Defendants invoke heavy burden on improper joinder showing no reasonable basis for recovery | Court applied Rule 12(b)(6)-type analysis and Fifth Circuit improper-joinder precedent; required plausible factual allegations |
| Remedy for deficient pleading against in-state defendant | Plaintiffs sought remand to state court | Defendants sought dismissal of in-state defendant to preserve diversity | Court dismissed Hollmuller without prejudice and denied remand |
Key Cases Cited
- Manguno v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 276 F.3d 720 (5th Cir.) (removing party bears burden to establish federal jurisdiction)
- Gasch v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 491 F.3d 278 (5th Cir.) (removal statute strictly construed; doubts resolved in favor of remand)
- Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L.P., 541 U.S. 567 (U.S.) (federal jurisdiction must exist at all stages; remand required if jurisdiction lacking)
- Smallwood v. Illinois Central R.R. Co., 385 F.3d 568 (5th Cir.) (improper-joinder doctrine; disregard non-diverse defendants if improperly joined)
- Green v. Amerada Hess Corp., 707 F.2d 201 (5th Cir.) (heavy burden on party alleging improper joinder)
- Great Plains Trust Co. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 313 F.3d 305 (5th Cir.) (standards for proving improper joinder)
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (U.S.) (plausibility pleading standard governs complaints)
- Hornbuckle v. State Farm Lloyds, 385 F.3d 538 (5th Cir.) (adjusters may be ‘‘persons’’ under Texas Insurance Code and potentially individually liable)
- Crockett v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 436 F.3d 529 (5th Cir.) (improper-joinder analysis framed as two-prong test)
- Int'l Energy Ventures Mgmt., L.L.C. v. United Energy Group, Ltd., 818 F.3d 193 (5th Cir.) (federal pleading standard applies when assessing improper joinder)
