Hernandez v. State
317 Ga. App. 845
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2012Background
- Hernandez was convicted after a jury trial of attempted murder, family violence aggravated battery, false imprisonment, and giving a false name to officers.
- Appellate motion for new trial was denied; Hernandez appeals on three grounds: inadmissible character evidence, ineffective assistance, and failure to merge offenses for sentencing.
- Hernandez and the victim dated beginning February 2009 and cohabited briefly; their relationship was volatile with prior violent incidents including a knife at the victim's throat and a punch to the mouth.
- Two days before the incident, Hernandez attacked the victim, throwing her to the ground and beating her on the head.
- On November 15, 2009, Hernandez stabbed the victim in the stomach during a confrontation at a friend's residence, leading to a prolonged struggle and the victim fleeing to safety; Hernandez was later arrested after the knife was recovered and he provided a false name to officers.
- Stipulated trial facts included blood on Hernandez’s clothing and on the recovered knife, and the blood depicted in photographs.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Admissibility of character evidence and mistrial | Hernandez: improper elicitation mandating mistrial. | Hernandez: curative instruction sufficed; no mistrial needed. | Mistrial not required; no abuse of discretion. |
| Ineffective assistance of counsel—mistrial renewal | Hernandez faulted counsel for not renewing mistrial after curative instruction. | No prejudice; curative instruction preserved fairness. | No ineffective assistance; renewal would not change outcome. |
| Ineffective assistance—cross-examination and limiting instruction | Counsel failed to perfect the motion-for-mistrial record and to seek limiting instruction. | Final limiting instruction in charge cured potential error. | No ineffective assistance; no showing of prejudice. |
| Merging of offenses for sentencing | Family violence aggravated battery and attempted murder should not merge. | OCGA 16-1-6(2) requires merging because same conduct proves both offenses. | Convictions for family violence aggravated battery and attempted murder must merge; remand for resentencing. |
Key Cases Cited
- Goss v. State, 305 Ga. App. 497 (2010) (standard for reviewing abuse of discretion in mistrial rulings)
- Ochle v. State, 218 Ga. App. 69 (1995) (curative instruction sufficiency when testimony is inadvertent)
- Owens v. State, 250 Ga. App. 61 (2001) (assessment of improprieties and curative measures)
- McGee v. State, 267 Ga. 560 (1997) (curative instruction and lack of officer-specific instruction)
- Jackson v. State, 267 Ga. 130 (1996) (mistrial not necessary when no instruction given to officer witness)
- Starks v. State, 240 Ga. App. 346 (1999) (curative instruction sufficient when no prior instruction violated)
- Massey v. State, 306 Ga. App. 180 (2010) (overwhelming evidence can render errors harmless)
- Drinkard v. Walker, 281 Ga. 211 (2006) (included-offense test for merging; evidence strength matters)
- Soilberry v. State, 289 Ga. 770 (2011) (merger principles for included offenses under 16-1-6(2))
- Ledford v. State, 289 Ga. 70 (2011) (battery vs murder as included offenses under 16-1-6(2))
- Louisyr v. State, 307 Ga. App. 724 (2011) (de novo review of merger questions)
