Heather R. Smith, appellant/cross-appellee v. Jeffrey Michael Janssen, appellee/cross-appellant.
16-0018
| Iowa Ct. App. | Mar 22, 2017Background
- Custody-exchange altercation (Oct 2015) between Heather Smith and Jeff Janssen; Heather entered Jeff’s vehicle trying to remove their older child; physical contact occurred between both adults.
- Each party sought a domestic abuse protective order against the other; actions were consolidated and a 1.5-day hearing was held.
- District court found both Heather and Jeff committed domestic-abuse assaults and issued protective orders in Dec. 2015.
- Both parties appealed the domestic-assault findings and the denial of trial attorney fees; appeals were consolidated and transferred to the Court of Appeals.
- Court of Appeals reviewed de novo (treated as an equitable proceeding) and gave weight to trial-court credibility findings while reassessing sufficiency of evidence that statutory assault elements were met.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Heather committed an assault by touching/poking Jeff after he said "Don't touch me" | Heather’s conduct was immature/taunting and not sufficiently offensive to violate a reasonable sense of personal dignity | Touching was unwanted but trivial and not offensive enough to constitute assault | Held: Heather’s repeated unwanted touches (shoulders, cheek) done to taunt were offensive and supported assault finding |
| Whether Heather committed assault by punching Jeff | Heather denied serious injury and argues punches were not established | District court found Heather punched Jeff two or three times | Held: Court did not need to resolve punches issue because offensive touching finding was sufficient |
| Whether Jeff committed an assault by putting hands on Heather while removing her from vehicle | Jeff claims he used reasonable force to protect children and himself—justified defense of others | Heather argues Jeff’s grabbing escalated situation and created risk; force was unnecessary and not justified | Held: Jeff’s use of force was not justified; his hands-on conduct escalated situation and supported assault finding |
| Whether trial and appellate attorney fees should be awarded | Each sought fees under Iowa Code §236.5(4) after prevailing on their own petitions | Trial court denied fees to both; both request appellate fees | Held: Trial court did not abuse discretion in denying trial fees; appellate court also denies appellate attorney fees |
Key Cases Cited
- Wilker v. Wilker, 630 N.W.2d 590 (Iowa 2001) (de novo review of equitable domestic-abuse proceedings)
- Knight v. Knight, 525 N.W.2d 841 (Iowa 1994) (equitable review standards)
- Molo Oil Co. v. City of Dubuque, 692 N.W.2d 686 (Iowa 2005) (appellate review mirrors trial mode)
- Bacon ex rel. Bacon v. Bacon, 567 N.W.2d 414 (Iowa 1997) (distinguishing law actions where review is for errors at law)
- Passehl Estate v. Passehl, 712 N.W.2d 408 (Iowa 2006) (minor evidentiary rulings do not convert equitable trial to law action)
- Sille v. Shaffer, 297 N.W.2d 379 (Iowa 1980) (de novo review despite evidentiary rulings)
- Nelson v. Winnebago Indus., Inc., 619 N.W.2d 385 (Iowa 2000) (offensive contact judged by reasonable sense of personal dignity)
- State v. Johnson, 291 N.W.2d 6 (Iowa 1980) (intent to offensively touch suffices for assault)
- State v. Spears, 312 N.W.2d 79 (Iowa Ct. App. 1981) (unwanted touching without consent can be offensive)
- State v. Redmon, 244 N.W.2d 792 (Iowa 1976) (unpermitted application of force in rude or insolent manner can be assault)
- State v. Rubio, 602 N.W.2d 558 (Iowa 1999) (limits on justification defense for use of force)
- Schaffer v. Frank Moyer Constr. Inc., 628 N.W.2d 11 (Iowa 2001) (statutory authority for trial fees can extend to appellate fees)
- In re Marriage of Benson, 545 N.W.2d 252 (Iowa 1996) (attorney-fee awards are discretionary)
