History
  • No items yet
midpage
425 F.Supp.3d 116
E.D.N.Y
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Keri Hauff, the only female officer in Farmingdale State College’s University Police Department, alleges repeated sexual harassment by Chief Marvin Fischer from 2005–2018, including leering, comments, unwanted touching, and a 2015 buttocks slap.
  • Hauff complained to the College’s Title IX coordinator in Sept. 2015; an informal Memorandum limited communications but was modified because it proved impractical.
  • Hauff submitted journal entries of continuing harassment in Sept. 2017 and filed a new Title IX complaint in Aug. 2018 after missing files were discovered; a panel substantiated her complaint and Fischer resigned, though he reportedly returned to campus on occasions.
  • Hauff sued SUNY, Farmingdale State College, and Fischer alleging Title IX hostile work environment and NYSHRL claims; she also alleged Fischer aided and abetted violations.
  • Defendants moved to dismiss raising Eleventh Amendment immunity for NYSHRL claims, arguing Title IX does not create an employee employment-discrimination remedy (or is displaced by Title VII), individual liability under Title IX is not permitted, some claims are time-barred, the Faragher/Ellerth affirmative defense applies, and punitive damages are unavailable.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Eleventh Amendment immunity for NYSHRL claims Hauff did not oppose; Title IX abrogates state immunity (argued elsewhere) SUNY/College and officials (official capacity) are arms of the State and immune from NYSHRL suits in federal court Dismissed NYSHRL claims against SUNY/College and Fischer in official capacity (Eleventh Amendment)
Availability of Title IX for employee hostile-work-environment claims against institution Title IX provides a private remedy for employees independent of Title VII; no nexus-to-education requirement Title VII is the exclusive remedy for employment discrimination and Title IX should not supplant Title VII; need nexus to educational program/activity Denied dismissal — court finds Title IX may be asserted by employees of federally funded institutions and rejects grafting a separate nexus requirement
Individual liability under Title IX (Fischer) Hauff sued Fischer individually (aiding/abetting and Title IX claims) Title IX does not authorize suits against individual employees Title IX claim against Fischer dismissed (no individual liability)
Timeliness / statute of limitations Hauff invokes continuing-violation doctrine and equitable tolling to include pre-2015 acts Defendants say incidents before Dec. 20, 2015 are time-barred Continued violations doctrine plausibly pleaded; pre-2015 acts may be considered as part of an ongoing hostile environment (claims survive pleading-stage timeliness challenge)
Sufficiency of hostile work environment allegations under Title IX Alleged frequent comments, touching, butt-slap, encroachment, and inadequate institutional response Defendants argue conduct not severe or pervasive enough and institution responded appropriately Court finds allegations sufficient at pleading stage to state hostile environment and adequate notice/deliberate indifference possible
Faragher/Ellerth affirmative defense N/A (Hauff argued College was deliberately indifferent) Defendants assert they prevented/corrected and Hauff failed to use remedies Dismissal on this defense denied at pleading stage (factual dispute unresolved)
Punitive damages availability under Title IX and NYSHRL Hauff sought punitive damages Defendants argued punitive damages are unavailable under Title IX and NYSHRL Punitive damages dismissed as to all defendants (punitive damages not available under Title IX; NYSHRL also bars punitive damages)

Key Cases Cited

  • Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools, 503 U.S. 60 (1992) (Title IX authorizes monetary damages)
  • Cannon v. University of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677 (1979) (implied private right of action under Title IX)
  • North Haven Bd. of Educ. v. Bell, 456 U.S. 512 (1982) (Title IX coverage extends to employees of federally funded programs)
  • Jackson v. Birmingham Bd. of Educ., 544 U.S. 167 (2005) (Title IX retaliation claim available to employees)
  • Fitzgerald v. Barnstable Sch. Comm., 555 U.S. 246 (2009) (Title IX does not authorize suits against individuals)
  • Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998) (employer defense to supervisory harassment)
  • Burlington Indus., Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998) (employer defense to supervisory harassment)
  • Barnes v. Gorman, 536 U.S. 181 (2002) (punitive damages unavailable under Title VI; relevant to Title IX damages analysis)
  • Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, 421 U.S. 454 (1975) (plaintiff may pursue remedies under multiple civil-rights statutes)
  • Purcell v. New York Inst. of Tech., 931 F.3d 59 (2d Cir. 2019) (Title IX claims in this Circuit subject to a three-year statute of limitations)
  • Yusuf v. Vassar College, 35 F.3d 709 (2d Cir. 1994) (Title IX supplements civil-rights protection in education)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hauff v. State University of New York
Court Name: District Court, E.D. New York
Date Published: Dec 3, 2019
Citations: 425 F.Supp.3d 116; 2:18-cv-07256
Docket Number: 2:18-cv-07256
Court Abbreviation: E.D.N.Y
Log In
    Hauff v. State University of New York, 425 F.Supp.3d 116