midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
563 B.R. 812
Bankr. E.D. Va.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtor filed Chapter 11 in 2010, listed a residence held in trust; court repeatedly found the property was not estate property.
  • Bankruptcy plan confirmed in 2012 contemplated sale of the property and payment of Nationstar’s secured claim; sale closed in August 2014 and Nationstar received proceeds.
  • Debtor later objected to Nationstar’s proof of claim; the court disallowed the balance after Nationstar did not respond.
  • Debtor sued Nationstar in 2016 alleging delays in approving a short sale (Jan 2013–Aug 2014) and various fraud, bad faith, and statutory violations.
  • Several claims were dismissed by consent or prior bench ruling; the opinion addresses remaining Counts I (background), IV (bad faith), VI (constructive fraud), VIII (actual fraud based on intent not to perform), and XV (failure to comply with federal housing regulation).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Count I — Background as standalone claim Background allegations support other counts; seeks recognition as independent claim Not an independent cause of action Dismissed; court will consider allegations for other counts
Count IV — Breach of implied covenant of good faith Nationstar delayed/blocked short sale in bad faith No contractual duty to approve short sale; covenant cannot override express terms Dismissed; short sale was not contractually required and covenant cannot rewrite express terms
Count VI — Constructive fraud for failing lender duties Nationstar misrepresented status as transferee/holder and failed lender duties Allegations lack particularity and plaintiff abandoned holder claim; no specific misrepresentations pleaded Dismissed for failure to plead fraud with particularity and absence of false representations
Count VIII — Actual fraud (intent not to perform) Nationstar represented it would perform duties but intended not to No specific fraudulent statements pleaded; plaintiff concedes holder status Dismissed for failure to plead the who/what/when/where/how of alleged fraud
Count XV — Violation of federal housing regulation (24 C.F.R. §203.604(b)) Deed of Trust incorporated HUD rules; Nationstar failed to hold face-to-face interview before three payments were missed Deed does not expressly incorporate HUD regs; loan is Fannie/Freddie type, not FHA-insured; regulation inapplicable Dismissed; Deed’s general “applicable law” language insufficient and HUD rule does not apply to this loan

Key Cases Cited

  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (pleading must state a plausible claim)
  • Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (complaint must allege plausible claims)
  • Walters v. McMahen, 684 F.3d 435 (courts need not accept legal conclusions)
  • Va. Vermiculite Ltd. v. W.R. Grace & Co., 156 F.3d 535 (duty of good faith limits exercise of contractual discretion)
  • Charles E. Brauer Co., Inc. v. Nations-Bank of Va., N.A., 251 Va. 28 (breach of good faith produces contract claim, not independent tort)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hackman v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC. (In re Hackman)
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia
Date Published: Jan 4, 2017
Citations: 563 B.R. 812; Case No. 10-17176-BFK; Adversary Proceeding No. 16-01177-BFK
Docket Number: Case No. 10-17176-BFK; Adversary Proceeding No. 16-01177-BFK
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. E.D. Va.
Log In