History
  • No items yet
midpage
E081790
Cal. Ct. App.
Jun 4, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Cha Haacke was hired to care for the elderly mother of defendant Desrie L. Pfister.
  • After the mother’s death, Pfister made public statements accusing Haacke of causing the mother’s death and other disparaging comments.
  • Haacke sued Pfister for slander, libel, false light (all forms of defamation), and intentional interference with prospective economic relations.
  • A jury found Pfister’s statements were defamatory per se but did not cause Haacke actual injury, awarding $5,000 in presumed damages only.
  • Haacke’s motion for a new trial was denied by the trial court, as no miscarriage of justice was found.
  • Haacke appealed, challenging only the denial of her new trial motion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Juror Misconduct New trial needed due to juror misconduct No evidence or argument below Forfeited & no prejudice shown; no abuse of discretion
Verdict Against the Law Jury misapplied burden on truth as defense N/A No prejudice; verdict found for plaintiff on this point
Attorney Misconduct/Irregular Proceedings Defendant misconduct in closing and witness questioning N/A Forfeited by no objections; presumed jury followed instructions
Inadequate Damages Damages awarded were legally insufficient N/A Forfeited; no showing evidence compelled more damages
Legal Error – Jury Instructions Error giving libel per quod when only per se requested N/A No prejudice; jury ruled for plaintiff on per se claim

Key Cases Cited

  • Jackson v. Mayweather, 10 Cal.App.5th 1240 (claims of false light must meet same requirements as defamation)
  • Haraguchi v. Superior Court, 43 Cal.4th 706 (abuse of discretion standard varies contextually)
  • Jehl v. Southern Pac. Co., 66 Cal.2d 821 (broad trial court discretion on new trial for inadequate damages)
  • Rayii v. Gatica, 218 Cal.App.4th 1402 (objection required for attorney misconduct claims)
  • Carroll v. Commission on Teacher Credentialing, 56 Cal.App.5th 365 (jury presumed to follow instructions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Haacke v. Pfister CA4/2
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jun 4, 2025
Citation: E081790
Docket Number: E081790
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
Log In
    Haacke v. Pfister CA4/2, E081790