History
  • No items yet
midpage
Greg Gibson and Christine Gibson v. Jose Fernando Cuellar
440 S.W.3d 150
Tex. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Gibsons and Cuellar entered a contract for deed and later an agreed judgment; Gibsons failed to deliver clear title as agreed.
  • Cuellar sued for specific performance and damages, including attorney’s fees, prompting court-ordered appointment of a receiver to close the real estate transaction.
  • Receiver was appointed Feb 21, 2011, to close the sale; the receiver sold the property and the court issued a decree confirming the sale on Apr 18, 2011.
  • Bench trial on attorney’s fees held Mar 29, 2012; final judgment awarded Cuellar $40,182.50 plus potential appellate fees.
  • Gibsons appealed arguing (i) improper receiver appointment and (ii) insufficient evidence to support the attorney’s fees award; the appellate court dismissed the receiver issue for lack of timely appeal and upheld the fee award.
  • Court affirmed final judgment on attorney’s fees and concluded it lacked jurisdiction to review the receiver appointment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the receiver appointment and related orders are appealable Gibsons challenge appointment of the receiver Cuellar supports appointment and related orders We lack jurisdiction over the receiver issues; untimely appeal
Whether the attorney’s fees award is supported by law and evidence Gibsons argue lack of proper pleading/presentment under 38.001 and 38.002 Cuellar’s pleadings and proof satisfy statutory requirements Court did not abuse discretion; attorney’s fees award affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • Hernandez v. Ebrom, 289 S.W.3d 316 (Tex. 2009) (interlocutory review after final judgment permissible in some circumstances)
  • Huston v. F.D.I.C., 800 S.W.2d 845 (Tex. 1990) (receivership orders and finality distinctions)
  • Sclafani v. Sclafani, 870 S.W.2d 608 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993) (timeliness of appeals from receiver-related orders)
  • London v. London, 349 S.W.3d 672 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011) (finality and appealability in related orders)
  • Carrington v. Hart, 703 S.W.2d 814 (Tex. App.—Austin 1986) (presentment and notice for attorney’s fees)
  • Ray v. Farmers’ St. Bank of Hart, 576 S.W.2d 607 (Tex. 1979) (presentment concept and evidence standards)
  • City of Keller v. Wilson, 168 S.W.3d 802 (Tex. 2005) (summary judgment standard and standard of review)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Greg Gibson and Christine Gibson v. Jose Fernando Cuellar
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Sep 5, 2013
Citation: 440 S.W.3d 150
Docket Number: 14-12-00644-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.