Greco v. State
427 Md. 477
| Md. | 2012Background
- Greco was convicted in 1982 of first degree premeditated murder, first degree rape, and first degree felony murder in Baltimore County.
- Postconviction relief was granted in 2009 by vacating his murder conviction but leaving other convictions intact; the intermediate court reinstated the murder conviction on appeal.
- The State appealed the postconviction court’s grant of relief; the circuit court later clarified the relief applied only to the murder conviction.
- The Court of Special Appeals held Hoey v. State and Simmons v. State did not create a new retroactive rule and that Johnson v. State remained controlling on the admissibility of mental impairment evidence.
- Greco contended the postconviction order violated UPPA § 7-106(c) by recognizing a new constitutional standard retroactively; the State argued jurisdiction and retroactivity issues.
- The case proceeded to this Court, which held that the Court of Special Appeals had jurisdiction, Greco was not entitled to postconviction relief, and Greco’s fifty-year sentence for first-degree murder was illegal while the fifty-year sentence for first-degree rape was not.
- On remand, the Court affirmed the judgment and remanded for correction of the illegal sentence.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the Court of Special Appeals had jurisdiction over the State’s appeal. | Greco: jurisdiction lacking because of superseded order. | State: jurisdiction exists; the February 2010 order clarified the September 2009 order. | Jurisdiction proper; timely appeal to the postconviction order., |
| Whether Hoey v. State and Simmons v. State established a new retroactive constitutional rule. | Greco: these decisions created a new retroactive standard under UPPA § 7-106(c)(2). | State: Hoey/Simmons clarified dicta but did not establish a new rule not previously recognized. | Hoey/Simmons did not create a new, not previously recognized rule for § 7-106(c)(2)(i); Petitioner barred. |
| Whether Greco’s sentence for first-degree murder was illegal and how remand should address it. | Greco: fifty-year term-of-years for murder converted from life with fifty years suspended; illegal under statute. | State: allow correction to life with fifty suspended on remand; cannot exceed maximum authorized by law. | Fifty-year murder sentence illegal; remand to impose lawful life sentence with fifty years suspended; rape sentence not illegal. |
Key Cases Cited
- Johnson v. State, 292 Md. 405 (1982) (holding diminished capacity not recognized as a defense; limited to specific issue of mens rea evidence addressing diminished capacity)
- Hoey v. State, 311 Md. 473 (1988) (mentally impaired evidence admissible to show absence of mens rea; not retroactive rule unless warranted by § 7-106(c))
- Simmons v. State, 313 Md. 33 (1988) (discussed Hoey; mental impairment evidence admissible to imperfect self-defense)
- Cathcart v. State, 397 Md. 320 (2007) (sentencing effect of unlawfully imposed sentence; split-sentence corrections under CJ § 12-702(b))
- Dixon v. State, 364 Md. 209 (2001) (remand sentencing limited to maximum legal sentence; CJ § 12-702(b) applied to correct illegal sentences)
- Kanaras v. State, 54 Md.App. 568 (1983) (psychiatric testimony admissibility before Hoey/Simmons; mental impairment evidence contested)
