History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gomez v. Randle
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 9656
| 7th Cir. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Gomez, a pro se prisoner, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against IDOC Director Randle, Stateville officials, and unknown defendants.
  • In May 2009 Gomez was wounded by shotgun pellets during a prison fight when an unidentified officer fired from a catwalk.
  • Gomez did not receive timely medical treatment; a medical technician and staff promised care that never materialized promptly.
  • An IA investigator later intimidated Gomez and demanded a polygraph, threatening transfer to Menard for noncompliance.
  • Gomez was transferred to Menard after a meeting with IA investigators; his emergency grievance was ultimately denied.
  • The district court dismissed the case after the court-appointed counsel withdrew, citing statute of limitations and lack of viable claims.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the excessive-forced claim was timely despite unknown officer identity Gomez argues tolling during the grievance process; timely if properly tolled District court held claim untimely due to missing identity Timeliness preserved; claim not barred by limitations.
Whether Gomez alleged deliberate indifference to medical needs Gomez alleges serious medical need and delay in treatment Dismissal appropriate for lack of named defendants or timely claim Complaint states deliberate-indifference claim against Palmer and unknown medical technician.
Whether Gomez's First Amendment retaliation claim survives Grievance activity and transfer were retaliatory Transfer and actions not tied to protected activity Retaliation claim stated; complaint survives as to the related defendants.

Key Cases Cited

  • Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1 (1992) (excessive force standard: core inquiry of motive and brutality)
  • Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976) (deliberate indifference standard for medical care)
  • Roe v. Elyea, 631 F.3d 843 (7th Cir. 2011) (serious medical need defined; objective standard for seriousness)
  • Smith v. Knox Cnty. Jail, 666 F.3d 1037 (7th Cir. 2012) (delay in treatment can constitute deliberate indifference)
  • Walker v. Sheahan, 526 F.3d 973 (7th Cir. 2008) (tolling during grievance process for § 1983 actions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Gomez v. Randle
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Date Published: May 14, 2012
Citation: 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 9656
Docket Number: 11-2962
Court Abbreviation: 7th Cir.