Ginger Cove Common Area Co. v. Wiekhorst
296 Neb. 416
Neb.2017Background
- Ginger Cove sued Wiekhorst for unpaid annual assessments; two co-defendants appear to have been dismissed for lack of service/prosecution.
- Wiekhorst filed a counterclaim alleging breach of fiduciary duty.
- A discovery dispute led to an October 2015 order finding Wiekhorst in contempt and striking his counterclaim as a sanction; the case was dismissed and later reinstated at various times in early October and December 2015.
- Wiekhorst moved in January 2016 to vacate the sanctions; the district court denied that motion in February 2016. A bench trial later resulted in judgment against Wiekhorst in April 2016; he timely appealed.
- Wiekhorst challenged the denial of his motion to vacate and asserted lack of timely notice of the reinstatement and sanctions hearings; the record did not include the relevant hearing transcripts or other proof contradicting the trial court’s journal entry.
- The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed, finding the sanction and denial orders interlocutory and reviewable on appeal from the final judgment, but that Wiekhorst failed to present a record to overcome the trial court’s journal entry.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the Feb. 2016 order denying motion to vacate is a final appealable order | Wiekhorst: appealable because it eliminated his counterclaim and denied relief | Ginger Cove: not final; challenge should await final judgment | Court: Not final—order did not affect a substantial right; interlocutory and reviewable after final judgment |
| Whether the Oct. 2015 sanctions order was final | Wiekhorst: sanctions order eliminated his counterclaim and was final | Ginger Cove: sanctions were a discovery sanction and interlocutory | Court: Sanctions order was interlocutory (discovery ruling), not a final order |
| Whether Wiekhorst received constitutionally adequate notice of reinstatement and sanctions hearings | Wiekhorst: transcript shows no proof of timely notice; due process violated | Ginger Cove: court’s journal entry states proper notice; presumption of verity applies | Court: Journal entry controls absent proof to the contrary; Wiekhorst failed to produce such evidence |
| Whether appellant preserved record to challenge denial of motion to vacate | Wiekhorst: bill of exceptions/transcript supports his claim | Ginger Cove: appellant must present record; no hearings transcripts present | Court: Wiekhorst failed to present the pertinent hearing records; appellant bears burden; affirm trial court |
Key Cases Cited
- Guardian Tax Partners v. Skrupa Invest. Co., 295 Neb. 639 (jurisdictional principles for appeals)
- Obad v. State, 277 Neb. 866 (standard of review for motions to vacate)
- Deines v. Essex Corp., 293 Neb. 577 (definition of final order affecting substantial rights)
- In re Adoption of Madysen S. et al., 293 Neb. 646 (final order requirements)
- Big John’s Billiards v. State, 283 Neb. 496 (avoidance of piecemeal appeals)
- Furstenfeld v. Pepin, 287 Neb. 12 (discovery orders not generally appealable interlocutorily)
- Cattle Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Watson, 293 Neb. 943 (final order analysis)
- State v. Deckard, 272 Neb. 410 (journal entries import verity)
- Alder v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co., 241 Neb. 873 (journal entry verity and appellant burden)
- Pierce v. Landmark Mgmt. Group, 293 Neb. 890 (appellant duty to present record)
