926 F. Supp. 2d 364
D.D.C.2013Background
- M.S. enrolled at Options Public Charter School in September 2010.
- Before enrollment, M.S. was diagnosed with bipolar disorder and ADHD.
- IDEA entitles M.S. to a FAPE and an IEP; proceedings concern these rights.
- On February 8, 2011, Options revised M.S.'s IEP, proposing 26 hours of special instruction, one hour of behavioral support weekly, and placement in a special classroom unit.
- On March 17, 2011, Genrette filed an administrative Due Process Complaint seeking private placement, compensatory education, and an FBA; a hearing was held April 27, 2011 and a final determination issued May 11, 2011.
- The HOD ordered an FBA but denied private placement and compensatory education; plaintiff sought attorney’s fees under IDEA and cross-motions for summary judgment were filed; the court grants defendant’s motion and denies plaintiff’s.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Genrette is the prevailing party under IDEA. | Genrette prevailed in the administrative action. | Plaintiff’s success was de minimis; relief was limited to an FBA. | Genrette did not prevail; defendant granted summary judgment. |
Key Cases Cited
- District of Columbia v. Straus, 590 F.3d 898 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (three-part prevailing-party test for IDEA fees)
- Tex. State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Indep. Sch. Dist., 489 U.S. 782 (1989) (fee recovery requires more than nominal success)
- Farrar v. Hobby, 506 U.S. 103 (1992) (nominal wins may bar fees)
- Artis ex rel. S.A. v. District of Columbia, 543 F. Supp. 2d 15 (D.D.C. 2008) (HOD must indicate denial of a FAPE to constitute prevailing relief)
- Linda T. ex rel. William A. v. Rice Lake Area School Dist., 417 F.3d 704 (7th Cir. 2005) (de minimis relief where broader remedies requested)
- McCrary v. District of Columbia, 791 F. Supp. 2d 191 (D.D.C. 2011) (prevailing-party status assessed on administrative record)
